2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(02)00183-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice strain evolution in IMI 834 under applied stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases single peak analysis was carried out using the diffraction peak from the Ti-α phase. Although the peak has a much lower intensity than peak it was chosen because it displays low intergranular strain [36], and hence is representative of the macrostress. Elastic strain was obtained in the usual manner relative to a strain-free lattice spacing, d 0 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases single peak analysis was carried out using the diffraction peak from the Ti-α phase. Although the peak has a much lower intensity than peak it was chosen because it displays low intergranular strain [36], and hence is representative of the macrostress. Elastic strain was obtained in the usual manner relative to a strain-free lattice spacing, d 0 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researchers have measured lattice strains under in situ loading using neutron diffraction for fcc [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], body-centered cubic (bcc) [17][18][19][20] and hexagonal close-packed (hcp) [21][22][23][24][25][26] polycrystalline metals. These neutron diffraction measurements have typically been limited to a few {h k l} lattice planes parallel and perpendicular to the specimen loading direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These neutron diffraction measurements have typically been limited to a few {h k l} lattice planes parallel and perpendicular to the specimen loading direction. The neutron diffraction measurements were used to validate various polycrystal deformation models, such as the Taylor [9][10][11], self-consistent [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and finite element models [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During elastic loading (data collected at 30, 140, 195 MPa), a qualitative estimate of the anisotropy measured for the individual grains can be ascertained by the change in slope of the individual trend lines displayed in Figure 10. Albeit at a different length scale, Daymond and Bonner [9] observed a similar behavior, reporting low levels of elastic anisotropy in the Ti alloy IMI838 during uniaxial tensile loading. As yielding is encountered (data collected at 230 and 285 MPa), localized plastic deformation is established.…”
Section: B Micro Xrdmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…[7,8] In addition, neutron diffraction has been used to assess the development of elastic and plastic anisotropy during evolution of lattice strain in the Ti alloy IMI834. [9] Supplementary to bulk diffraction methods, synchrotron micro-XRD is emerging as a unique tool for the direct observation of plastic deformation with subgrain spatial resolution. Experimental techniques using a highly focused submicron incident X-ray beam, employing polychromatic diffraction, have been developed to measure deviatoric (shear) strain and crystal orientation with subgrain resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%