2014
DOI: 10.1021/cg500143w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice Water-Induced Helical Stacking of Tartrate-Bridged Dinuclear Palladium(II) Complexes: The Role of Hydrogen Bonding

Abstract: Hydrous crystals of [{PdII(bpy)}2(μ-x-tart)]·nH2O (bpy: 2,2′-bipyridine; tartH2 2–: tartrate; 1a: x = l, n = 6; 2a: x = d, n = 6; 3a: x = dl, n = 4; 4a: x = meso, n = 4) and anhydrous crystals of [{PdII(bpy)}2(μ-l-tart)] (1b) were isolated from aqueous and MeOH solutions, respectively. X-ray crystallography revealed the stacked structures of clamshell-like dinuclear units in 1a–3a and 1b, where intramolecular metal–metal and π–π stacking interactions were observed. Right- and left-handed helically stacked colu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stacking or π···π interactions are among the most common (together with hydrogen and halogen bonds) noncovalent interactions found in both natural and synthetic systems . These interactions play a very important role in controlling of the crystal packing and recognition of aromatic compounds (as the auxiliary stabilizing force), in regulation of stereoselectivity in synthetic organic reactions, they are significant in biological systems (for example in nucleic acids – DNA and RNA), and also govern the processes important in many areas of science, such as analytical chemistry, medical chemistry, , and nanotechnology. , Thus, the studies on their role in both model and real systems evolved drastically during past decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stacking or π···π interactions are among the most common (together with hydrogen and halogen bonds) noncovalent interactions found in both natural and synthetic systems . These interactions play a very important role in controlling of the crystal packing and recognition of aromatic compounds (as the auxiliary stabilizing force), in regulation of stereoselectivity in synthetic organic reactions, they are significant in biological systems (for example in nucleic acids – DNA and RNA), and also govern the processes important in many areas of science, such as analytical chemistry, medical chemistry, , and nanotechnology. , Thus, the studies on their role in both model and real systems evolved drastically during past decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resonances for the aromatic bpy protons and aliphatic Me protons split to be six peaks and two peaks, respectively (Figure a). The characteristic signal pattern originates from not only trans influence of the two oxygen atoms, coordinated to each metal center, but also a shielding effect between the intramolecular 4 Me 2 bpy moieties, suggesting the presence of π–π interaction. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic signal pattern originates from not only trans influence of the two oxygen atoms, coordinated to each metal center, but also a shielding effect between the intramolecular 4 Me 2 bpy moieties, suggesting the presence of π−π interaction. 5,11 The UV−vis absorption spectrum in DMF at room temperature showed an intense absorption band at 275 nm, assigned to a ligand-centered π−π* transition inside bpy (LC, L = bpy), and a relatively weak broad band at 488 nm, derived from mixed transitions of metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) and interligand charge transfer (L′LCT, L′ = tart), 12 as shown in Figure 2b. The complex was non-emissive in fluid DMF solution at room temperature but emissive in rigid DMF glass at 77 K, when excited at 365 nm.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the struc-tures found in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD), 20 the L-tartrate ligand bridges the transition metal centres, leading either to extended polymeric structures, as in a series of isomorphous compounds {[M(NN)(L-tart-H 2 )]•xH 2 O} n (M 2+ = Mn, Co, Cu, and Zn; NN = 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline; L-tart-H 2 = dianion of L-tartaric acid; x = 5, 6), [21][22][23][24][25][26] or to isolated dinuclear complexes of the formula [{M(NN)} 2 (L-tart-H 2 )] (M 2+ = Pd and Pt). 27,28 Complexes containing two tartrate bridging groups of the same enantiomeric configuration are considered to be energetically more stable than those with bridges of opposite chirality. 19 For this reason, these complexes are also very stable toward intramolecular racemization, making them suitable building blocks for the construction of chiral extended inorganic-organic frameworks with a polar crystal structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to divalent transition metal cations, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] chromium(III) ions form bridged dinuclear complexes with meso-, D-and L-tartaric acid, in which one proton per two tetranegative tartrate ligands remains undissociated (as shown in Scheme 1). 19,29 The structure of the mesotartrate-chromium(III) complex anion with an aromatic N-donor ligand was described by Ortega et al 30 and the structure of the L-tartrate-chromium(III) complex anion is topologically the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%