2013
DOI: 10.1177/147470491301100118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laughing at the Looking Glass: Does Humor Style Serve as an Interpersonal Signal?

Abstract: Abstract:Objective: The provision of information appears to be an important feature of humor. The present studies examined whether humor serves as an interpersonal signal such that an individual"s style of humor is associated with how the individual is perceived by others. Method: We examined this issue across two studies. In Study 1, undergraduate participants (257 targets) were rated more positively by their friends and family members (1194 perceivers) when they possessed more benign humor styles. In Study 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same study also found that men high in prestigiousness were more attractive for long-term relationships, suggesting men higher in socially desirable traits, such as affiliation and cooperativeness, are considered better partners. This corresponds with ZEIGLER-HILL, BESSER and JETT's (2013) finding that those who use affiliative humour are more attractive than those who use aggressive humour. Affiliative humour is markedly different from aggressive humour because, rather than being at the expense of individuals, it is inclusive and brings groups together (MARTIN et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same study also found that men high in prestigiousness were more attractive for long-term relationships, suggesting men higher in socially desirable traits, such as affiliation and cooperativeness, are considered better partners. This corresponds with ZEIGLER-HILL, BESSER and JETT's (2013) finding that those who use affiliative humour are more attractive than those who use aggressive humour. Affiliative humour is markedly different from aggressive humour because, rather than being at the expense of individuals, it is inclusive and brings groups together (MARTIN et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Through questionnaire studies, MARTIN et al (2003) found that individuals high in aggressive humour are more neurotic, serious, and higher in unmitigated agency and masculinity, with other studies demonstrating a link between aggressive humour and psychopathy (VESELKA et al 2010;MARTIN et al 2012;MASUI, FUJIWARA and URA 2013). Demonstrably, aggressive humour is associated with less socially desirable traits (KUIPER andLEITE 2010) andZEIGLER-HILL, BESSER andJETT (2013) have found that people who use aggressive humour are considered to be lower in attractiveness than those who use affiliative humour. Crucially, however, ZEIGLER-HILL, BESSER and JETT's (2013) study did not examine whether relationship type impacted on attractiveness ratings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The four humor styles are also associated with a range of personality measures with the benign styles of humor linked to extraversion and openness and, conversely, the negative styles of humor positively correlated with neuroticism and psychopathy, and negatively correlated with agreeableness and conscientiousness (Galloway, ; Martin et al., ; Vernon, Martin, Schermer, & Mackie, ; Veselka, Schermer, Martin, & Vernon, ). Ziegler‐Hill, Besser, and Jett () proposed that the different styles of humor send very different signals to the social environment and provided evidence that adult targets displaying the more benign styles of humor are perceived more positively by others (see also Kuiper & Leite, ). Similarly, Kuiper et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of humor in a dyadic conversation implies communalities in the interlocutors’ construals (Flamson & Barrett, ). It reveals an attempt to establish and elaborate interactional common ground (Clark, ), which may facilitate getting acquainted and advance the interpersonal alignment of viewpoints (Curry & Dunbar, ; Zeigler‐Hill, Besser, & Jett, ). Thereby, feelings of connectedness and closeness as well as the interlocutors’ involvement in the dialogue are augmented, all of which have been reported to be associated with shared humor (Curry & Dunbar, ; Fraley & Aaron, ; Kashdan et al, ; Kurtz & Algoe, , Li et al, ; Weisfeld, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%