2020
DOI: 10.1080/00940798.2020.1723425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laughter in Oral Histories of Displacement: “One Goes on a Mission to Solve Their Problems”

Abstract: How to cite:Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Petros's narrative is also marked by frequent recourse to humour and laughter, a topic that remains understudied in the literature on oral history. 32 Both humour and laughter in oral testimonies may function in part to ease the narration of difficult or traumatic experiences, but they also reflect what Ned Norrick calls the 'humorous dual perspective' that arises from a narrator re-evaluating their actions and assumptions in the past based on their knowledge and identity today. 33 Indeed, it can be suggested that Petros's laughter when relating incidents such as the renaming of Ms Greece or the plan for evading an aerial attack on the car is connected to the fact that these tactics were ultimately not required (Petros and co. were neither captured nor attacked on the road) and, consequently, what seemed at the time to be of utmost importance and severity may appear in retrospect incongruous, inconceivable or even absurd.…”
Section: Microacts In Kyrenia: Petros Evdokas and Kyriakos Koudonasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 Petros's narrative is also marked by frequent recourse to humour and laughter, a topic that remains understudied in the literature on oral history. 32 Both humour and laughter in oral testimonies may function in part to ease the narration of difficult or traumatic experiences, but they also reflect what Ned Norrick calls the 'humorous dual perspective' that arises from a narrator re-evaluating their actions and assumptions in the past based on their knowledge and identity today. 33 Indeed, it can be suggested that Petros's laughter when relating incidents such as the renaming of Ms Greece or the plan for evading an aerial attack on the car is connected to the fact that these tactics were ultimately not required (Petros and co. were neither captured nor attacked on the road) and, consequently, what seemed at the time to be of utmost importance and severity may appear in retrospect incongruous, inconceivable or even absurd.…”
Section: Microacts In Kyrenia: Petros Evdokas and Kyriakos Koudonasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Indeed, it can be suggested that Petros's laughter when relating incidents such as the renaming of Ms Greece or the plan for evading an aerial attack on the car is connected to the fact that these tactics were ultimately not required (Petros and co. were neither captured nor attacked on the road) and, consequently, what seemed at the time to be of utmost importance and severity may appear in retrospect incongruous, inconceivable or even absurd. 34 To build on Norrick's observations, laughter allows Petros to adopt two different identities in his testimony: one emphasizing his agency, creativity and the meaningfulness of his microacts given what he knew at the time, and the other demonstrating retrospective self-awareness of the limitations and incongruities of these acts. 35 Another Cyprus Project interviewee -Kyriakos Koudonas, born 1925was at home in Lapithos to the west of Kyrenia on 20 July.…”
Section: Microacts In Kyrenia: Petros Evdokas and Kyriakos Koudonasmentioning
confidence: 99%