2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.1027408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lava fountain jet noise during the 2018 eruption of fissure 8 of Kīlauea volcano

Abstract: Real-time monitoring is crucial to assess hazards and mitigate risks of sustained volcanic eruptions that last hours to months or more. Sustained eruptions have been shown to produce a low frequency (infrasonic) form of jet noise. We analyze the lava fountaining at fissure 8 during the 2018 Lower East Rift Zone eruption of Kīlauea volcano, Hawaii, and connect changes in fountain properties with recorded infrasound signals from an array about 500 m from the fountain using jet noise scaling laws and visual image… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic frequency of different components of subsonic to supersonic jet noise has been used to get inferences on the diameter of erupting volcanic vents and their temporal evolution (Gestrich et al., 2022; Taddeucci et al., 2021). Acoustic amplitude is an important tool to monitor jet velocity as a proxy for eruption intensity, and its link with jet noise dynamics in the volcanic environment is now established (Fee et al., 2013; Matoza et al., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic frequency of different components of subsonic to supersonic jet noise has been used to get inferences on the diameter of erupting volcanic vents and their temporal evolution (Gestrich et al., 2022; Taddeucci et al., 2021). Acoustic amplitude is an important tool to monitor jet velocity as a proxy for eruption intensity, and its link with jet noise dynamics in the volcanic environment is now established (Fee et al., 2013; Matoza et al., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the traditional designation of eruption styles based on visual observation of eruptions at type localities, eruption imaging and geophysical recording are currently pushing toward more quantitative definitions of explosive eruptions. Recent advances in eruption imaging, in particular, have extensively helped parameterizing explosive activity at several volcanoes, including, but not limited to, Stromboli (Italy) (e.g., Bombrun et al., 2015; Pering et al., 2020; Ripepe et al., 1993; Taddeucci, Scarlato, et al., 2012), Yasur (Vanuatu) (Gaudin et al., 2017; Simons, Cronin, Eccles, Bebbington, & Jolly, 2020; Simons, Cronin, Eccles, Jolly, et al., 2020; Spina et al., 2015), Reunion (France) (Edwards et al., 2020), Etna (Italy) (Pering et al., 2014; Pioli et al., 2022; Spina et al., 2017), Batu Tara (Indonesia) (Spina et al., 2021), Fuego (Guatemala) (Marchetti et al., 2009), Kilauea (USA) (Gestrich et al., 2022; Houghton et al., 2021; Mintz et al., 2021; Patrick et al., 2019), and Eyjafjallajökull and Fagradalsfjall (Iceland) (Dürig, Gudmundsson, Karmann, et al., 2015; Dürig, Gudmundsson, & Dellino, 2015; Lamb et al., 2022). These eruption imaging and geophysical studies have largely contributed to understanding the underlying processes and defining more systematically eruption styles of mafic explosive activity, mostly Hawaiian and Strombolian ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%