“…Although they differ in their views of royal power and the degree to which the governing apparatus of pre‐Conquest England can be regarded as centralized, both treat pre‐Conquest England as a largely functional political community capable of sustaining social hierarchies, redressing crime and other forms of extra‐legal violence and preserving a degree of continuity from one generation to the next. It is for this reason that a number of recent studies have sought to take a middle road, recognizing that the crown was supported by a largely stable administrative infrastructure, though one frequently limited by the competing demands of Church, aristocracy and at times even local community (Cubitt, 2007, 2011; Hudson, 2000; Hyams, 2004; Jurasinski, 2015, 2019; Lambert, 2017; Molyneaux, 2015; Rabin, 2007, 2020; Roach, 2013a, 2013b; Rumble, 2013). One might reasonably say that Wormald's thesis has not been so much overturned as moderated.…”