Parental Rights and Responsibilities 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315090085-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Law and the complexities of parenting: parental status and parental function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the light of what we have so far argued, we can get back to the legal category of parent in Belgium and the Netherlands. Based on the establishment of filiation vis-à-vis maximum two parents, parenthood or 'parental status' (Lind and Hewitt, 2009: 392) automatically generates an indivisible bundle of family rights and obligations, among which parental responsibility and maintenance obligations are the most relevant, as they are constitutive of lifelong (and beyond, through inheritance law) kinship with a child. This bundle of rights and obligations as such is accessible only for parents, adopters being equalled with parents.…”
Section: The Regulatory Force Of Legal Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of what we have so far argued, we can get back to the legal category of parent in Belgium and the Netherlands. Based on the establishment of filiation vis-à-vis maximum two parents, parenthood or 'parental status' (Lind and Hewitt, 2009: 392) automatically generates an indivisible bundle of family rights and obligations, among which parental responsibility and maintenance obligations are the most relevant, as they are constitutive of lifelong (and beyond, through inheritance law) kinship with a child. This bundle of rights and obligations as such is accessible only for parents, adopters being equalled with parents.…”
Section: The Regulatory Force Of Legal Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such conditions, a concern about the 'reality' of parenthood that seeks to exclude exterior elements seems an old-fashioned essentialist preoccupation with the traditional nuclear family model which should not be 'addressed' so much as simply left behind (Boyd 2007: 71). However, recent legal confl icts between, for example, lesbian parents and their sperm donors, make it clear that for some social parents there are still reasons to fall back onto the idea of the nuclear family in order to assert the legitimacy of the family that either cannot or chooses not to reproduce heterosexually (Lind and Hewitt 2009;Polikoff 2001-2;Kelly 2004-5;Kelly 2008-9;Dempsey 2004;Boyd 2007: 402). The new confi gurations of the relationship of opposition between the nuclear family and what lies outside of it, as well as more traditional examples, open up opportunities for deconstructive critique and this is the concern of this chapter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%