Lawyers and Mediation

Clark, Bryan

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23474-3

Cited by 17 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Jāatzīst gan, ka reizēm advokāti ieteikumos var dot priekšroku mediatoriem advokātiem, jo var uzskatīt, ka mediatori ar tiesvedības pieredzi labāk sapratīs viņu teikto. 10 Advokātam klients mediācijas procesam ir jāsagatavo. Būtu ieteicams, lai klientam jau pirms procesa uzsākšanas būtu paskaidroti svarīgākie mediācijas procesa principi, klienta tiesības tajā, kā arī sniegta konsultācija par līgumu ar mediatoru.…”

Section: Advokāts -Konsultants Par Mediācijas Procesuunclassified

“…Tādējādi advokāts izsenis ir saistīts ar tiesām, sniedzot padomus personām strīda atrisināšanā un pārstāvot personas tiesas procesā. 1 Modernajā pasaulē arvien biežāk par visefektīvāko konflikta risināšanas veidu tiek uzskatīts dialogs ar mērķi rast kompromisu un nonākt pie konsensa, nevis uzvarēt konfliktā un pierādīt savu taisnību. Viena no tiesvedībai alternatīvām strīdu risināšanas metodēm ir mediācija -process, kurā konfliktā iesaistītās puses ar mediatora palīdzību sarunu un sadarbības procesā meklē risinājumus un cenšas rast savstarpēji pieņemamu vienošanos strīdu jautājumos.…”

unclassified

“…Savukārt strīda risināšanai tiesā ir daudz abstraktāks mērķis -noskaidrot objektīvo patiesību, fokusējoties uz pagātnē notikušo. 2 1 Litvins G. Advokātu process: neatbildētie jautājumi. Jurista Vārds, 2015. gada 7. aprīlis, Nr.…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Advokāta loma mediācijas procesā

Grase¹

2019

Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Latvija AdvokātA lomA mediācijAs procesā role of lAwyer in mediAtion process summary This report examines the role of attorney in mediation and analyses the possible involvement of an attorney in each stage of mediation, evaluating both the limits of providing legal assistance and the manner in which the attorney participates in mediation. The attorney may have a critical influence in resolution of the conflict involving his or her client. Special attention is paid to the difference between mediation and legal proceedings, and the importance of the attorney acquiring additional knowledge, skills, experience, and behavior patterns to support the client in the process of mediation.

show abstract

Section: Advokāts -Konsultants Par Mediācijas Procesuunclassified

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Advokāta loma mediācijas procesā

Grase¹

2019

Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, mediation is non-adversarial in its nature and seeks to find a solution to the dispute which is acceptable to both parties. Clark (2012) suggests that in mediation each party retains control of the negotiations as they are conducted in person with the opportunity to discuss all the issues both in and around the dispute openly, rather than the submission of documents and interpretation of the dispute by a third party. Ter-Haar and Ter-Haar, (2010) argues that resolution of a dispute through mediation provides the parties with a greater feeling of success than by other forms of ADR.…”

Section: Adjudicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

An investigation into the different styles of the lawyer and construction specialist when mediating construction disputes

Wall¹,

Ankrah

Charlson³

2016

IJLBE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the views and experiences of mediators from different professional backgrounds practising in the construction industry. Previous research shows that the legal profession dominates construction mediation in both England and Wales. Design/methodology/approach The phenomenological approach was used to capture the lived experiences of the interviewees and gain insight into their views and practices. The data collection was by semi-structured interviews. The data was then analysed using software to establish themes. Findings The major difference in mediator practice discovered between the two groups is the use of the evaluative style by lawyer and facilitative style by non-lawyer mediators. Non-lawyer mediators strongly reported their criticisms of the evaluative style in mediation suggesting that it undermines the parties’ ability to self-determine their own dispute and reduces the level of satisfaction experienced by the parties in the process of mediation. Lawyer mediators supported the use of the evaluative style as an acceptable compromise on the parties’ self-determination and feelings of satisfaction in pursuit of achieving the goal of a settlement in mediation, which was significantly better than the escalation of stress and costs to the parties in the event that the dispute escalates to litigation. In addition, mandatory mediation, the role of advisors/advocates, governance and the future of mediation were explored. Originality/value The research is anticipated to be of particular benefit to parties considering referring a construction dispute to mediation.

show abstract

“…19 The mediation forum has drawn praise for its ability to help the parties generate creative and flexible solutions to their dispute, rather than merely monetary compensation. 20 It is far less expensive than litigation and is also less time-consuming. 21 Given its amicable and harmonious character, parties are more likely to preserve and sustain their relationship after the conflict is resolved.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can 'Medical Futility' Conflicts be Mediated?

Choong¹

2018

Journal of Medical Law and Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mr Justice Francis ended his judgment in Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates, Gard and Gard with the recommendation that 'mediation should be attempted in all cases such as this one'. Although this gave the impression that mediation would be unquestionably beneficial in the Gard case and other 'medical futility' cases where the patient is incompetent, this paper contends that this is not as straightforward as it might at first appear. With the general absence of a middle ground and with the law in such cases frequently on doctors' side, mediation's potential for a satisfactory resolution of medical futility conflicts is arguably limited.

show abstract

Lawyers and Mediation

Cited by 17 publications

References 26 publications

Advokāta loma mediācijas procesā

Advokāta loma mediācijas procesā

An investigation into the different styles of the lawyer and construction specialist when mediating construction disputes

Can 'Medical Futility' Conflicts be Mediated?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About