“…While the CHE is elegantly simple and has led to valuable insights into electrocatalytic mechanisms, it also suffers from key limitations, namely that all molecular geometries, including the catalyst adsorbate structures, are relaxed at the potential of zero charge (PZC), that all electron transfers must be charge neutral (e.g., proton-coupled electron transfer, PCET, rather than sequential proton/electron transfer), and that it neglects the potential dependence on energetics of chemical steps. − GC-DFT accurately describes electrochemical mechanisms due to its self-consistent treatment of the electrified interface under an applied potential and its ability to capture decoupled charge transfer, widely believed to be a relevant elementary step in CO 2 R (CO 2 + * + e – → CO 2 – *, where * represents a surface active site). ,, We also use attenuated total reflection surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy (ATR-SEIRAS) to investigate metallic and oxidized Sn surfaces during electrocatalysis. We recently developed a method of preparing Sn-based films that exhibit excellent surface enhancement in ATR-SEIRAS . Much of the ongoing debate in the community regarding CO 2 R on Sn originates from the lack of reliability in preparing and characterizing model Sn surfaces for spectroscopic investigation, as well as ambiguous frequency assignment. , By carefully comparing our observations from the GC-DFT and ATR-SEIRAS studies, we show that CO 2 R is feasible on both metallic and oxidized Sn through a combination of pathways that lead to adsorbed formate.…”