2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layout optimization for renovation of operational offshore wind farm based on machine learning wake model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to their broad applicability and ease of use, metaheuristic algorithms are widely reported in most literature for solving offshore wind farm layout optimization problems. These include the genetic algorithm [95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104], particle swarm optimization [88,96,105], and other intelligent algorithms like the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [106,107], random search (RS) [108], differential evolution (DE) [109], solid isotropic material interpolation techniques with penalization (SIMP) [110], EO [111], variable neighborhood search (VNS) [112], and simulated annealing (SA) [113,114]. Reference [115] modeled offshore wind farm layout optimization as a Markov decision process, using hybrid algorithms combining genetic algorithms and the Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), demonstrating the potential of reinforcement learning in this field.…”
Section: Layout Optimization Of Offshore Wind Farmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their broad applicability and ease of use, metaheuristic algorithms are widely reported in most literature for solving offshore wind farm layout optimization problems. These include the genetic algorithm [95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104], particle swarm optimization [88,96,105], and other intelligent algorithms like the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [106,107], random search (RS) [108], differential evolution (DE) [109], solid isotropic material interpolation techniques with penalization (SIMP) [110], EO [111], variable neighborhood search (VNS) [112], and simulated annealing (SA) [113,114]. Reference [115] modeled offshore wind farm layout optimization as a Markov decision process, using hybrid algorithms combining genetic algorithms and the Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), demonstrating the potential of reinforcement learning in this field.…”
Section: Layout Optimization Of Offshore Wind Farmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear, for instance, if the work done by Croonenbroeck and Hennecke (2021) to optimize a wind farm with 20 wind turbines could have found L-BFGS outperforming (in terms of the AEP) the GF methods if more multi-start runs had been applied (six runs in this study). Examples of previous studies on multi-starts for GB-WFLO considered random multi-starts (Brogna et al, 2020;Yang and Deng, 2023;Thomas et al, 2023;Baker et al, 2019) and Latin hypercube sampling (Guirguis et al, 2016), while an example of a multi-start GF method (RS) also using randomly produced initial guesses is given in Feng and Shen (2017a). A heuristic approach developed by Pérez et al (2013) assumed turbines were widely spread throughout the wind farm area as a strategy to avoid the wake effects and produce better initial guesses.…”
Section: Number Of Initial Startsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This presents an optimization challenge constrained by the presence of initial wind turbines. Yang and Deng introduced a wind farm layout optimization framework that employs an ML wake model to enhance power production while retaining the original wind turbines [79]. The approach optimized the arrangement of newly incorporated wind turbines within the constraints of the existing ones.…”
Section: Lian Et Al Developed An Mlp-based Regression Model To Relate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang and Deng [79] MLP Employed an ML wake model to optimize wind farm layout while retaining existing turbines.…”
Section: Zhang Et Al [75] Gated Recurrent Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%