2002
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2002.1145755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layover solution in multibaseline SAR interferometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
252
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
252
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From [16] we can get that the height unambiguous range of 10-element full uniform array extends from −4.5 to 4.5 height resolution units.…”
Section: The Height Dimensional Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From [16] we can get that the height unambiguous range of 10-element full uniform array extends from −4.5 to 4.5 height resolution units.…”
Section: The Height Dimensional Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…τ m is the radar reflectivity of the mth sources. {x m (n)} N n=1 are the speckle complex vectors pertinent to the mth source, and v(n) is Gaussian thermal noise with zero mean and power σ 2 v [16]. ϕ m is the interferometric phase at the overall baseline, and a(ϕ m ) is the steering vector for the mth source, which can be written as…”
Section: Tomography Sarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ensemble of target decorrelation and APS results in a non Gaussian distribution of the data, which complicates the a-priori assessment of the LDF estimator performance for any given scenario. In the existing literature the computation of InSAR lower bounds is commonly approached as the problem of estimating a set of deterministic parameters in presence of decorrelation noise (23), (24), whereas the role of the APS is in general neglected. Within this chapter it will be shown that, under the hypothesis that a single, distributed, target is present within the SAR resolution cell, the roles of target decorrelation and APSs may be jointly treated by exploiting the Hybrid Cramér-Rao Bound (HCRB), where the unknowns are both deterministic parameters and stochastic variables.…”
Section: Performances Estimation In Multi Baseline Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%