2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.02890
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lazy Lagrangians with Predictions for Online Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, Theorem 1 proves that, when utility perturbations are only subject to four mild technical conditions, such as in standard OCO, it is impossible to achieve vanishing fairness-regret. Similar negative results were obtained under different setups of primal-dual learning and online saddle point learning [5,50,62], but they have been devised for specific problem structures (e.g., online matrix games) and thus do not apply to our setting.…”
Section: Contributionssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Namely, Theorem 1 proves that, when utility perturbations are only subject to four mild technical conditions, such as in standard OCO, it is impossible to achieve vanishing fairness-regret. Similar negative results were obtained under different setups of primal-dual learning and online saddle point learning [5,50,62], but they have been devised for specific problem structures (e.g., online matrix games) and thus do not apply to our setting.…”
Section: Contributionssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In particular, we consider 𝛿 𝛿 𝛿 𝑑 (π‘₯ π‘₯ π‘₯) β‰œ 1 𝑇 𝑠 ∈ T 𝑒 𝑒 𝑒 𝑠 (π‘₯ π‘₯ π‘₯) βˆ’ 𝑒 𝑒 𝑒 𝑑 (π‘₯ π‘₯ π‘₯) to quantify how much the adversary perturbs the average utility by selecting a utility function 𝑒 𝑒 𝑒 𝑑 at timeslot 𝑑 ∈ T . Recall that π‘₯ π‘₯ π‘₯ β˜… ∈ X denotes the optimal allocation under HF objective (5). We denote by Ξ(T ) the set of all possible decompositions of T into sets of contiguous timeslots, i.e., for every {T 1 , T 2 , .…”
Section: Adversarial Model and Impossibility Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4.1 proves that, when utility perturbations are only subject to four mild technical conditions, such as in standard OCO, it is impossible to achieve vanishing fairness-regret. Similar negative results were obtained under different setups of primal-dual learning and online saddle point learning [257][258][259], but they have been devised for specific problem structures (e.g., online matrix games) and thus do not apply to our setting.…”
Section: Contributionssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…) regret bounds. Specifically, OFTRL versions have been proposed in [24] and recently used in [55] for problems with budget constraints, while [15], [17] tailored these ideas to continuous caching. The problem of discrete caching is fundamentally different.…”
Section: Optimistic Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%