2015
DOI: 10.4322/sc.2016.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LC-MS/MS determination of chloramphenicol in food of animal origin in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some LC-MS/MS methods have been published concerning the simultaneous determination of CAP in food and feed samples [18][19][20][21][22] with the different chromatographic conditions, longer retention time, and poor recoveries [23]. Although, these methods were reported for quantification of CAP in different sample matrices such as feed, meat, milk, honey, and some biological matrices [24][25][26] they are incompetent to analyze poultry meat. The method we developed and validated is more precise with good selectivity, linearity, precision, and high recovery that met all the criteria of the validation parameters (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some LC-MS/MS methods have been published concerning the simultaneous determination of CAP in food and feed samples [18][19][20][21][22] with the different chromatographic conditions, longer retention time, and poor recoveries [23]. Although, these methods were reported for quantification of CAP in different sample matrices such as feed, meat, milk, honey, and some biological matrices [24][25][26] they are incompetent to analyze poultry meat. The method we developed and validated is more precise with good selectivity, linearity, precision, and high recovery that met all the criteria of the validation parameters (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to fatal health issues including bone marrow aplasia, aplastic anemia, and gray baby syndrome, CAP has been banned in food-producing animals in EU, Canada, the United States, and some other countries due to its potential harmful effects on human (Guidi et al, 2015;Samsonova et al, 2012), which explained well that why CAP was not detected in US swine wastewater. However, CAP possesses broad spectrum of activity for disease treatment and is cost-effective, thus it is still commonly used in developing countries.…”
Section: Differences Of Vas In Chinese and Us Swine Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had been banned in many countries because of the adverse effects on human health [ 25 ]. According to the literature, CAP could still be detected in several food substrates [ 26 ], indicating that it was still being used. As a coating on metal packaging materials for food, bisphenol A (BPA) could migrate into food over time and pose a threat to human health, even under suitable storage conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%