2011
DOI: 10.4155/bio.10.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LC–MS/MS-ESI Method for Simultaneous Quantitation of Three Endocannabinoids and its Application to Rat Pharmacokinetic Studies

Abstract: An LC-MS/MS-ESI method has been validated for simultaneous estimation of the three endocannabinoids; N-arachidonoylethanolamine (AEA), N-oleoylethanolamine (OEA) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), in surrogate matrix using AEA-d (4) as an internal standard with highest sensitivity over the existing methods. Simple precipitation was used to extract analytes and these were subsequently analyzed on a monolithic column. Linear response function was established over the concentration range 12.3 to 1225 pg/ml for AEA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, administration of naïve [ 13 C] 4 -PEA did not yield a significant peak plasma concentration of [ 13 C] 4 -PEA. Based on a basal value of around 9 pmol/ml PEA in rat plasma (Sharma et al, 2011 ; Wang et al, 2014 ), oral administration of PEA-um appears to rapidly elevate by some 50% circulating PEA levels. Vacondio et al ( 2015 ) orally administered to rats a formulation of PEA (100 mg/kg suspended in corn oil and subjected to ultrasonication/vortexing) that reached a peak, 20-fold rise in plasma concentration after 15 min followed by a return to baseline within 2 h. In terms of particle size their formulation would likely be more similar to PEA-um than to naïve PEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, administration of naïve [ 13 C] 4 -PEA did not yield a significant peak plasma concentration of [ 13 C] 4 -PEA. Based on a basal value of around 9 pmol/ml PEA in rat plasma (Sharma et al, 2011 ; Wang et al, 2014 ), oral administration of PEA-um appears to rapidly elevate by some 50% circulating PEA levels. Vacondio et al ( 2015 ) orally administered to rats a formulation of PEA (100 mg/kg suspended in corn oil and subjected to ultrasonication/vortexing) that reached a peak, 20-fold rise in plasma concentration after 15 min followed by a return to baseline within 2 h. In terms of particle size their formulation would likely be more similar to PEA-um than to naïve PEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood as well as hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC) collected at sacrifice were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 • C for later PEA analysis. Plasma and tissue PEA levels were measured as described by Sharma et al [31] and Liput et al [32], respectively.…”
Section: Single Oral Administration Of Um-peamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While analytical method validation data have not been presented to accompany any of the above-mentioned systemic OEA studies, a number of validated LC-MS or LC-MS/MS methods for OEA quantification in brain tissue [19][20][21][22] and plasma [23][24][25][26][27][28] (in combination with other NAEs) have been reported. The applications of these have been to measure endogenous concentrations in tissues [20][21][22][23][24] to study the physiology of OEA under normal and pathological conditions [25,28] or the pharmacology of agents that modulate endogenous concentrations (e.g., FAAH inhibitors) [19]. To validate methods in the presence of background endogenous OEA, a number of approaches have been used to produce calibration curves including background subtraction [19,20,22,23,25], neat solutions [21,26,28], and stripped matrices [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of these have been to measure endogenous concentrations in tissues [20][21][22][23][24] to study the physiology of OEA under normal and pathological conditions [25,28] or the pharmacology of agents that modulate endogenous concentrations (e.g., FAAH inhibitors) [19]. To validate methods in the presence of background endogenous OEA, a number of approaches have been used to produce calibration curves including background subtraction [19,20,22,23,25], neat solutions [21,26,28], and stripped matrices [27]. However, each of these methods for validation has drawbacks such as unpredictable variation in background signal and an inability to account for ion suppression/enhancement and varying extraction efficiency, which can make quantification in samples unreliable [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%