2004
DOI: 10.1080/10588330490471304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LCA for Site Remediation: A Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For sites where the transport distance is much shorter, the composting scenario would come out much better. This outcome is in accordance with what has been earlier reported by Suèr et al (2004) [11] and Toffoletto et al (2005) [9], that transportation is a key element when choosing between in-situ and ex-situ remediation technology.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For sites where the transport distance is much shorter, the composting scenario would come out much better. This outcome is in accordance with what has been earlier reported by Suèr et al (2004) [11] and Toffoletto et al (2005) [9], that transportation is a key element when choosing between in-situ and ex-situ remediation technology.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Lemming et al [5] reviewed 12 different studies on life cycle assessment of soil and groundwater remediation in 2009. Similarly Suèr et al [11] in 2004 made a literature review on LCA for site remediation. A common conclusion from these reports is that transport of excavated soil often contributes significantly to the total environmental impact of any off site remediation technology, especially at longer transport distances.…”
Section: Methodology and Case Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a literature review, Suér et al [11] illustrate that the result of LCA is highly dependent on the method used and that the choice of impact categories heavily affects the outcome of an LCA study. An updated overview (Table 2) of case studies dealing with LCA of the remediation of contaminated sites illustrates the high variation in impact assessment methods that have been used over the last [18] Industrial site contaminated with sulfur…”
Section: Application Of Lca To the Remediation Of Contaminated Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides primary impacts, associated with the state of the site and secondary impacts, associated with the site remediation itself [12], LCA for contaminated site management should also account for tertiary impacts, associated with the effects of the reoccupation of the site [13]. Therefore, different scenarios could be considered and the collection of additional data concerning temporal and spatial effects should be integrated into the evaluation of contaminated sites [11]. For example, Cadotte et al [14] considered two different remediation scenarios: one based on a fast treatment time and another one based on a low environmental impact.…”
Section: Application Of Lca To the Remediation Of Contaminated Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the control of the operation is more difficult and depending on the permeability of the soil and soil stratification, the operation may results in very poor results. On the other hand, ex-situ technologies permit a better control of the operation, and the remediation results are not very affected by some soil characteristics as permeability and stratification [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%