2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2005.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LCAO study of the Cu(110)-p(2×1)O surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cu(110)–O surface is anisotropic with Cu–O– chains running along the ⟨001⟩, or y -direction, forming a parallel array in the ⟨11̅0⟩, or x -direction. The electronic structure and chemical bonding of Cu–O– chains have been characterized by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARUPS), scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy, optical spectroscopy, and theory. The surface electronic band dispersions measured by ARUPS and parametrized by a tight binding model portend 1D electronic character along Cu–O– chains in the y -direction, weak coupling both among Cu–O– chains in the x -direction, and to the bulk bands of the substrate. , Figure b shows the overlayer structure obtained immediately after dosing ∼1.0 Langmuir of CO at 77 K onto the Cu(110)–O surface. Initially, CO molecules assume a dense disordered structure corresponding to ∼0.5 ML coverage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cu(110)–O surface is anisotropic with Cu–O– chains running along the ⟨001⟩, or y -direction, forming a parallel array in the ⟨11̅0⟩, or x -direction. The electronic structure and chemical bonding of Cu–O– chains have been characterized by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARUPS), scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy, optical spectroscopy, and theory. The surface electronic band dispersions measured by ARUPS and parametrized by a tight binding model portend 1D electronic character along Cu–O– chains in the y -direction, weak coupling both among Cu–O– chains in the x -direction, and to the bulk bands of the substrate. , Figure b shows the overlayer structure obtained immediately after dosing ∼1.0 Langmuir of CO at 77 K onto the Cu(110)–O surface. Initially, CO molecules assume a dense disordered structure corresponding to ∼0.5 ML coverage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large amount of work has been performed in order to understand the surface electronic states of the added row reconstruction, using both experimental methods such as photoemission spectroscopy [195][196][197][198] and theory [198][199][200] . The character of the O-Cu bonding is found to be predominantly ionic, and the surface O(2p) orbitals hybridize strongly with the Cu(3d) states, forming bonding and antibonding linear combinations, with the antibonding bands not having been identified unambiguously yet.…”
Section: Cu(110)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 As well known, this surface reconstructs according to the added row geometry, forming Cu-O-Cu chains in the ͑001͒ direction. The electronic structure resulting from the calculations was found to agree very well with the experimental data, and it was possible to locate the p y antibonding band of the oxygen, a band whose exact position has been intensively searched in the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%