LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in a Hierarchical Virtual Private LAN Service (H-VPLS)

Stokes, Olen; Dutta, Pranjal; Balus, Florin

doi:10.17487/rfc7361

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The specification of applications and the allowed control plane packets are outside the scope of this document. If the PW is a spoke in H-VPLS, any Media Access Control (MAC) addresses learned via the PW SHOULD be flushed when it transitions to standby state, according to the procedures in RFC 4762 [3] and in [10].…”

Section: Standby Statementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit

Muley¹,

Aissaoui²

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In addition, a second status bit is defined to allow peer PE nodes to coordinate a switchover operation of the PW. Finally, this document updates RFC 4447 by adding details to the handling of the PW status code bits in the PW Status TLV. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6870.

show abstract

Section: Standby Statementioning

confidence: 99%

“…If the PW is a spoke in H-VPLS, any MAC addresses learned via the PW SHOULD be flushed when it transitions to standby state according to the procedures in RFC 4762 [3] and [10].…”

Section: O Standby Statementioning

confidence: 99%

Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit

Muley¹,

Aissaoui²

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is accomplished by sending an LDP Address Withdraw Message with a MAC List TLV containing the MAC addresses to be removed from all other Provider Edge nodes over the LDP sessions. [RFC7361] describes an optimized MAC withdrawal mechanism that can be used to remove only the set of MAC addresses that need to be relearned in H-VPLS networks. [RFC7361] also describes optimized MAC withdrawal operations in PBB-VPLS networks.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[RFC7361] describes an optimized MAC withdrawal mechanism that can be used to remove only the set of MAC addresses that need to be relearned in H-VPLS networks. [RFC7361] also describes optimized MAC withdrawal operations in PBB-VPLS networks.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%