Le champ interstitiel des dirigeants piqueteros

Blanco, Maricel Rodriguez

doi:10.7202/1092577ar

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although they first came to light in the late 1980s (Memmi, 1989), it was not until the late 1990s that studies began to turn them into a sui generis category whose general properties needed to be determined (Topalov, 1999). Fields in which IS have been identified include: medical ethics (Memmi, 1989), urban policies (Topalov, 1999; Tissot, 2007; Payre, 2007; Ho-Pun-Cheung, 2021), social problems such as drug addiction (Mauger, 2001) and school failure (Morel, 2014), international expertise (Eyal, 2002, 2006; Dezalay, 2008; Stampnitzky, 2013a; Soussoko, 2022), European law and policy (Vauchez, 2008, 2011; Vauchez & Mudge, 2012; Lebrou, 2015), think tanks (Medvetz, 2012; Lepont, 2017), social work (Mauger, 2012; Rodriguez Blanco, 2023), social and cultural activities (Mauger, 2015), interdisciplinary sciences (Panofsky, 2011, 2014), government communication (Hubé, 2020), and diplomatic relations (Ferré, 2021). Pierre Bourdieu defined fields as spaces that, through processes of institutionalization, have grown autonomous around a specific interest (Bourdieu, 1971).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to study the stability of interstitial spaces: an analysis based on the case of the visibility of French intellectuals

Attencourt

2024

Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reports on an investigation into the channels through which intellectuals have gained public recognition since the 1970s (quality press, intellectual journals, think tanks, conference venues, cultural radio and TV programs, publishing houses, etc.). Through the prism of field theory, we explored a space – that of the visibility of ideas – situated at the crossroads of several institutionally established fields (academic, intellectual, media, political, and economic). While the number of studies devoted to this type of interstitial space has multiplied since the 2000s, the focus has mainly been on their heteronomy through comparisons with autonomous fields. This approach tends to lose sight of the fact that they could neither emerge nor endure in the absence of stability. Based on the notion of the space of visibility of ideas, the present paper attempts to show that it is possible to apprehend the stability of these labile spaces by adopting an ethnographic approach, conducive to the articulation of micro/meso/macro levels and the mixing of methods. In so doing, we put forward the idea that interstitial spaces can ultimately be analyzed in terms of perimeters and capital, in other words, as fields.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to study the stability of interstitial spaces: an analysis based on the case of the visibility of French intellectuals

Attencourt

2024

Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

L’emprise des médias sur le champ intellectuel

Attencourt

2024

Politiques De Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cet article analyse l’emprise des médias de grande diffusion sur la circulation des idées à travers le rôle de groupes sociaux et d’institutions « intermédiaires » au sens où ils assurent le passage entre des régions distinctes de l’espace social. À cette fin, nous mobilisons une enquête sur les nouveaux circuits de visibilité des idées qui se sont développés au sortir des années 1970 en associant légitimité savante et audience élargie : presse de qualité, émissions de radio et de télévision, revues intellectuelles à grand tirage, laboratoires d’idées, établissements culturels, agences de conférenciers, maisons d’édition, etc. L’exploration de ce champ nouveau montre que le circuit des conférences savantes pour le grand public y occupe la position d’un espace intermédiaire qui favorise l’accès des intellectuels aux médias et redouble leurs chances d’y faire carrière. Avec l’essor de l’idéologie du décloisonnement culturel à la fin des années 1960, le circuit des conférences a pu bénéficier de la politique d’extension du domaine culturel mise en place au début des années 1980, de l’autolégitimation offerte par une production équivoque en termes de dispositif et de contenus et, enfin, de biens propices au marketing culturel (événementiel et produits dérivés). Par ailleurs, les professionnels engagés dans l’organisation des conférences ont su mobiliser les ressources du décloisonnement culturel pour placer le monde intellectuel dans l’orbite des classements médiatiques et accroître ainsi leur pouvoir d’intermédiaires.

show abstract

Le champ interstitiel des dirigeants piqueteros

Cited by 2 publications

References 45 publications

How to study the stability of interstitial spaces: an analysis based on the case of the visibility of French intellectuals

How to study the stability of interstitial spaces: an analysis based on the case of the visibility of French intellectuals

L’emprise des médias sur le champ intellectuel

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About