1996
DOI: 10.3406/quad.1996.1155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le débat public sur les biotechnologies dans les pays du sud de l'Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Austria and Luxembourg soon banned the product under Directive 90/220 Article 16. The Italian government too banned the product, temporarily, until the company presented a plan to delay insect resistance [30]. When the European Commission demanded that Austria and Luxembourg withdraw their bans, this demand drew little support from other member states; some implicitly used the impasse to pressurize the European Commission to accept responsibility for managing the insect-resistance problem.…”
Section: Insecticidal Maizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austria and Luxembourg soon banned the product under Directive 90/220 Article 16. The Italian government too banned the product, temporarily, until the company presented a plan to delay insect resistance [30]. When the European Commission demanded that Austria and Luxembourg withdraw their bans, this demand drew little support from other member states; some implicitly used the impasse to pressurize the European Commission to accept responsibility for managing the insect-resistance problem.…”
Section: Insecticidal Maizementioning
confidence: 99%