Le déni en psychiatrie

Bardou, H.; Vacheron-Trystram, Marie-Noëlle; Cheref, S.

doi:10.1016/j.amp.2004.11.013

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Definitions Of Denial 771

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2007

2013

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 11 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, it is impossible to draw a definitive line between normal and 79 pathological denial" (Stotland & Stotland, 1998, p. 248). For some authors, denial implies 80 first the recognition of a reality, then its active but unconscious rejection, a refusal to accept 81 its existence (Bardou, Vacheron-Trystram, & Cheref, 2006;Spinelli, 2001). Others consider 82 this a relatively conscious adjustment mechanism (for example, Brezinka, Huter, Biebl, & 83 Kinzl, 1994).…”

Section: Definitions Of Denial 77mentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the relationship between neonaticide and denial of pregnancy using data from judicial files

Vellut

Cook

Tursz

2012

Child Abuse & Neglect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The term 'denial of pregnancy' cannot fully reflect the complexity of emotions and feelings felt by all perpetrators of neonaticide and is used differently by different professionals. The term itself and its excessive generalization contribute to pathologizing women while absolving those around them and has little operational value in preventing neonaticides. The authors suggest rethinking the terms presently used to describe the phenomenon of pregnancy denial.

show abstract

Section: Definitions Of Denial 77mentioning

confidence: 99%