Le financement par crowdfunding. Quelles spécificités pour l’évaluation des entreprises ?

Bessière, Véronique; Stéphany, Éric

doi:10.3166/rfg.242.149-161

Cited by 53 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Crowdfunding is a financing method that aims for a slice of projects that are mostly between micro-credit and business angels. It is a complementary method of financing to conventional seed capital (love money, seed funds, business angels, venture capital) regarding the amounts raised (Bessière and Stéphany, 2014). Crowdfunding is considered by bankers as a tool for financing innovation.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Different Ways of Collaboration between a Retail Bank and Crowdfunding

Attuel-Mendes¹

2017

Strategic Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Different Ways of Collaboration between a Retail Bank and Crowdfunding

Attuel-Mendes¹

2017

Strategic Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Numerous works use mathematical models from microeconomics to analyze various players' interests in using crowdfunding (Belleflamme et al 2014). Such strategic and economic (Belleflamme et al 2015) interests are also present in articles that emphasize the importance for companies of integrating crowdfunding as a specific tool within company strategy (Bessière and Stephany 2014;Berg Grell et al 2015). In fact, crowdfunding makes it possible to outsource tasks and to reduce the need for fundraising and investment.…”

Section: A New Paradigm For Production and Cultural Value?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Rouzé¹

2019

Cultural Crowdfunding: Platform Capitalism, Labour and Globalization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The early years of the twenty-first century saw the emergence of the idea of a 'collaborative' web, a Web 2.0 where Internet users would actively participate in producing content and creating value from it. Following the financial crises and especially the dotcom crash, the term 'Web 2.0' was coined in 2005 by the American entrepreneur and expert Tim O'Reilly, with a view to rebuilding confidence among investors in the Internet (Fuchs 2008). O'Reilly was one of the first to popularize the idea that the Internet would now be based on a participative model in which the user would go from being a mere consumer to a 'content generator' (Le Deuff 2007). An identical vision was implicit in the notion of 'social media' , which became common currency in the same period, despite its vagueness. In line with these different discursive propositions, specialized technical and economic apparatuses or dispositifs 1 for extracting value from communication flows on the web began to emerge: search engines, blogging platforms, content aggregators, virtual worlds, platforms for broadcasting video, social networks, and so on. Distinctive to these platforms is their heavy dependence on the contributions of their own user communities. The discourses underpinning the participative and/or collaborative aspect of the Internet, along with their 'implementations' , all seem to come back to the idea that pooling together the efforts of individuals can open up a better future, How to cite this book chapter:

show abstract

“…Il nous a donc paru important d'étudier davantage « la foule », un acteur essentiel du crowdfunding (avec le porteur de projet). Le crowdfunding faisant appel aux nouvelles technologies, il nous a alors semblé pertinent de nous centrer sur la « jeune foule », parce qu'adepte d'Internet, des nouvelles technologies et des réseaux sociaux, ces derniers apparaissant comme particulièrement importants dans la construction de larges communautés sur lesquelles les plateformes de crowdfunding prennent appui (Mollick, 2014, Onnée et Renault, 2014, Boeuf, Darveau et Legoux, 2014, Bessière et Stéphany, 2014…”

Section: Une Revue De La Littérature Sur Le Crowdfundingunclassified

Le crowdfunding et les jeunes

Bouaiss

Maque

2016

Rev. Fr. Gest.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Notre étude vise une meilleure connaissance des pratiques des jeunes afin de saisir leurs connaissances et comportements vis-à-vis du crowdfunding. Notre échantillon comprend 435 étudiants (23,5 ans en moyenne). Notre étude dévoile 3 profils : « les crowdfunders actifs », « les crowdfunders potentiels » et « les non intéressés ». Nos résultats montrent aussi de fortes singularités selon le genre. Ainsi les étudiants montrent un intérêt plus important pour les projets de type entrepreneuriaux alors que les étudiantes sont plus sensibles au financement d'actions humanitaires et civiles.

show abstract

Le financement par crowdfunding. Quelles spécificités pour l’évaluation des entreprises ?

Cited by 53 publications

References 6 publications

The Different Ways of Collaboration between a Retail Bank and Crowdfunding

The Different Ways of Collaboration between a Retail Bank and Crowdfunding

Introduction

Le crowdfunding et les jeunes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About