1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf02223612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le grégarisme chezdysdercus cingulatus Fabr. (Heteroptera, Pyrrhocoridae): nouvelle méthode d'interprétation statistique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same kind of explanation can be provided to account for the formation of clusters in the German cockroach Blattella germanica (Amé et al 2004;Jeanson et al 2005). Similar mechanisms could also probably explain the aggregation in natural cavities or crevices observed in various species of animals, for example, in the Heteroptera Dysdercus cingulatus (Farine & Lobreau 1984), the sandy beach isopod (Odendaal et al 1999) or the spiny lobsters (Childress & Herrnkind 2001). Note that any kind of spatial heterogeneity can be the basis of an individual preference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The same kind of explanation can be provided to account for the formation of clusters in the German cockroach Blattella germanica (Amé et al 2004;Jeanson et al 2005). Similar mechanisms could also probably explain the aggregation in natural cavities or crevices observed in various species of animals, for example, in the Heteroptera Dysdercus cingulatus (Farine & Lobreau 1984), the sandy beach isopod (Odendaal et al 1999) or the spiny lobsters (Childress & Herrnkind 2001). Note that any kind of spatial heterogeneity can be the basis of an individual preference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In a series of interesting experiments, Farine and Lobreau (1984) studied the kinetics of gregarious behavior in the Heteropteran Dysdercus cingulatus. They demonstrated a strong relation between the population density and the level of aggregation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%