2014
DOI: 10.4000/rao.2479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le site Bronze ancien de La Caillouerie à Saint-Lô d’Ourville (50), un site spécialisé en contexte littoral ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Neolithic and Bronze Age periods, most of the archaeological remains were discovered within paleosoils currently overlain by the dune sand covers. These sites correspond to perennial or temporary occupations initially located far behind the coastline, so that they do not provide any data on a possible use or frequentation of coastal dunes, except for some flintknapping activity as seen at Kerminihy or, not so far from Brittany, at La Caouillerie in Cotentin peninsula (Rousseau et al, 2014). For the Late Iron Age and Roman periods, archaeological data indicate numerous perennial settlements in dune environments, often with long-lasted occupation of several centuries.…”
Section: Disturbances Due To Human Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the Neolithic and Bronze Age periods, most of the archaeological remains were discovered within paleosoils currently overlain by the dune sand covers. These sites correspond to perennial or temporary occupations initially located far behind the coastline, so that they do not provide any data on a possible use or frequentation of coastal dunes, except for some flintknapping activity as seen at Kerminihy or, not so far from Brittany, at La Caouillerie in Cotentin peninsula (Rousseau et al, 2014). For the Late Iron Age and Roman periods, archaeological data indicate numerous perennial settlements in dune environments, often with long-lasted occupation of several centuries.…”
Section: Disturbances Due To Human Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…En effet, typologiquement parlant, ce terme peut à la fois désigner un nucléus résultant de cette technique de débitage et un outil utilisé comme pièce intermédiaire. Or, seule la tracéologie peut permettre de tendre vers l'un ou l'autre (Rousseau, 2014a). À la République, onze éléments ont été qualifiés de pièces esquillées, dès lors que le support d'origine prend la forme d'un éclat, mais sans que cela préjuge pour autant d'une fonction d'outil, d'autant que la présence de deux pièces esquillées typologiques dans l'amas de débitage tend à suggérer qu'il s'agit plutôt d'éléments de débitage plus que d'outils.…”
Section: Bulletin De La Société Préhistorique Françaiseunclassified