2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jradio.2011.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le système TIRADS en échographie thyroïdienne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of some US features had earlier been described as highly suspicious for malignancy, and they include marked hypoechogenicity, taller-than-wide shape, irregular contours and the presence of calcifications [5,6,12]. In our study, these features were found to be highly suspicious for malignancy as can be seen from the odds ratios, sensitivities, specificities, PPV and NPV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of some US features had earlier been described as highly suspicious for malignancy, and they include marked hypoechogenicity, taller-than-wide shape, irregular contours and the presence of calcifications [5,6,12]. In our study, these features were found to be highly suspicious for malignancy as can be seen from the odds ratios, sensitivities, specificities, PPV and NPV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Although this approach makes it possible to stratify nodules into categories, it can be difficult to assign every thyroid nodule into the equation proposed in clinical practice. To further achieve a practical tool in the hands of sonographers in analysing thyroid nodules and to improve communication between radiologists and clinicians, Russ et al [12] proposed a TIRADS classification that was further modified after feedback from those who used it [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11) is thought to correspond either to the capsule of the nodule or to the surrounding capsular vessels, or even sometimes to the adjacent compressed parenchyma. A thin halo reduces the risk of malignancy (DOR of 0.3), while a thick halo or absence of a halo increases it (DOR of 3.4) [33]. Campanella et al [10] reported a high risk of malignancy associated with an absent halo (7.1; 95% CI: 3.7–13.7).…”
Section: Importance Of Other Us Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we proceeded to perform a retrospective study on 500 nodules (4). The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio of each US sign were calculated, and a specific vocabulary and a standardized report were established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%