2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2010.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le Test des cinq mots dans les formes légères de maladie d’Alzheimer : comparaison du score total, du Score Total Pondéré, du Score d’apprentissage et du Score de mémoire dans trois classes d’âge (60 ans, 70 ans, 80 ans)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both scores range from 0 to 10. We also calculated a TWS using this formula similar to the formula used by Croisile 6 : (immediate free recall × 2) + immediate cued recall + (delayed free recall × 2) + delayed cued recall.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both scores range from 0 to 10. We also calculated a TWS using this formula similar to the formula used by Croisile 6 : (immediate free recall × 2) + immediate cued recall + (delayed free recall × 2) + delayed cued recall.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their recent study, Croisile et al confirmed that the FWT was useful to discriminate 202 normal participants and 302 patients with mild AD (MMSE > 19). 6 They calculated a total weighted score (TWS), which gives a higher coefficient to free recalls (total weighted score = [2 × free recalls] + cued recalls). Among the various scores that can be calculated from the FWT, this TWS had the highest accuracy with sensitivity and specificity both above 93% at various optimal cutoff scores according to age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…deafness, blindness) ▪ physical condition compatible with the conduct of the investigation → If at least one of these criteria are present : patient cannot be evaluated, but is included in the survey. This non‐evaluation is written in the observation notebook. → If none of these criteria : patient is evaluated Step 3 – Evaluation items ▪ concomitant treatments ▪ instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in four items (evaluation is done on the last period when patient lived at home) ▪ evaluation of risk factors for dementia ▪ cognitive impairment detection set: – Dubois 5 Word Test 18,19 – Verbal Fluency Test – Clock Test 20 ▪ Mini‐Geriatric Depression Scale in Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMS, consensus version by GRECO) 21,22 Step 4 – Results Information → If no cognitive impairment is suspected : results are shared with patient and/or the person in a qualifying relationship, and with GP when patient is leaving the rehab unit. → If cognitive impairment but dementia discovered before entering the rehab unit : information is written in the observation notebook. Has a follow up been done in the last 6 months?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%