2018
DOI: 10.3390/app8091431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leachability and Stability of Hexavalent-Chromium-Contaminated Soil Stabilized by Ferrous Sulfate and Calcium Polysulfide

Abstract: Ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) and calcium polysulfide (CaS5) stabilization are practical approaches to stabilizing hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI))-contaminated soil. The leachability and stability of Cr(VI) and Cr are important factors affecting the effectiveness of stabilized Cr(VI)-contaminated soil. This study compared the leachability and stability of Cr(VI) and Cr in Cr(VI)-contaminated soil stabilized by using FeSO4 and CaS5. The contaminated soil was characterized before and after stabilization, and the effectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al studied the Cr(VI) content of a contaminated soil stabilized by FeSO 4 and CaS 5 . e Cr(VI) content of the stabilized soil decreased from 168 to 94 mg/kg to 21 and 4.2 mg/kg when the reductant dosage increased from 1% to 5%, respectively [31]. ese results indicate that CHBC is more advantageous than FeSO 4 and CaS 5 in stabilized Cr(VI) soil.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Zhang et al studied the Cr(VI) content of a contaminated soil stabilized by FeSO 4 and CaS 5 . e Cr(VI) content of the stabilized soil decreased from 168 to 94 mg/kg to 21 and 4.2 mg/kg when the reductant dosage increased from 1% to 5%, respectively [31]. ese results indicate that CHBC is more advantageous than FeSO 4 and CaS 5 in stabilized Cr(VI) soil.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…At this time, the contact area between the heavy-metal ions in the contaminated soil and the external environment, especially water, increased, which reduced the ability of the repair agent to adsorb and wrap chromium ions, so that chromium ions were easily leached. In the leaching test, the use of the acidic leaching solution also destroyed the pH balance of the repaired chromium-contaminated soil, the hydrated gel was dissolved and desorbed, and the heavy metals changed, thereby accelerating the leaching of heavy-metal ions 24 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicochemical soil properties, such as pH, texture and humus content, considerably affect the degree of oxidation of Cr compounds [ 47 ] which, in consequence, affects their toxic effect on plants. Cr(VI) is very harmful to plants—the Cr 2 O 7 2− compound is highly toxic, while Cr 3+ contamination at the same concentration causes no damage [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%