Advances in Unsaturated Soil, Seepage, and Environmental Geotechnics 2006
DOI: 10.1061/40860(192)35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaching Column Tests on Arsenic-Soil Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the main author and his co-workers have been studying laboratory and field scale analysis of naturally occurring inorganic contaminants such as As(V) and As(III) in the context of groundwater contamination in Bangladesh (Khan et al 2003;Shaw and Thomas 2004;Tan et al 2006). In this study, the effect of bacterial activity on the release of arsenic was examined from an experimental point of view.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, the main author and his co-workers have been studying laboratory and field scale analysis of naturally occurring inorganic contaminants such as As(V) and As(III) in the context of groundwater contamination in Bangladesh (Khan et al 2003;Shaw and Thomas 2004;Tan et al 2006). In this study, the effect of bacterial activity on the release of arsenic was examined from an experimental point of view.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Engineering geology is seen to make two valuable contributions to this field. First, through laboratory-and field-scale studies it provides an insight into the geological factors that affect contaminant fate and transport in the subsurface, such as the presence of preferential flow paths ), sorbing materials Pietzsch et al 2009;Tan 2009) and technogenic processes (Petrova et al 2009). Second, it draws upon the principles of hydrogeology to develop analytical and numerical models that may be useful to estimate the fate and transport of contaminants through the subsurface and, thus, whether or not contaminants are likely to reach receptors at sufficient concentrations to cause unacceptable risks.…”
Section: Fate and Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that the material generated using this technique could be used as fertile topsoil in quarry reclamation, thus minimizing waste sent off-site to D. I. SCOTT & A. W. HATHEWAY landfill. Furthermore, engineering geologists have contributed to the understanding of how geological materials can be added to soils and sediments to enhance the sorption of contaminants during their migration through the subsurface, thus increasing the time taken for the contaminants to reach receptors Tan 2009). For example, Alamino et al (2009) examined the migrationreduction effect of adding swelling bentonitic clay minerals and organic matter to cadmium-contaminated soils, whereas Tan (2009) examined the reduction in arsenic migration resulting from the addition of organic matter to arseniccontaminated soils.…”
Section: Remediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method that evaluates the long-term leachability potential of arsenic is the use of continuous column tests within a simulated landfill environment in terms of pH, redox potential, and biological activity. Although column leach testing provides a realistic simulation tool to examine the interactions between ABSR and particular surroundings, the long testing time, months to years, limits its application for routine risk assessment of contaminated solid waste (Tan et al, 2006, Ghosh et al, 2006). Compared with column tests, a relatively simple and more widely used method is sequential extraction, which can provide information on proportion of a contaminant in different phases and consequently on its leachability and bioavailability (Tessier et al, 1979, Shiowatana et al, 1006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%