2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2011.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaching of elements from bottom ash, economizer fly ash, and fly ash from two coal-fired power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average thorium content in the fly ash from the LCB and USCB is lower, and the uranium content is higher than in fly ash, which is generated in combusted coal in Poland (according to reference [43]: content of Th = 25.9 ppm, U = 8.6 ppm; according to reference [47]: content of Th = 23.0 ppm, U= 10.6 ppm; shown in Tables 2 and 3). Compared to the combustion residues generated in other power plants (Tables 2 and 3), the Th and U contents in the studied fly ash are similar to fly ash from power plants in the USA (for Th) [48,49] and power plants in Brazil and China (for U) [39,46]. The Th content in the studied slag is similar to the Th content in the slag from other cited power plants, and the uranium content in the slag from the USCB feed coal is the same as in the slag from the Figueira power plant in Australia and Brazil [49,50], whereas from the LCB it is similar to the U content in the slag from power plants in China.…”
Section: Content and Distribution Of Th And U In Fly Ash And Slagmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The average thorium content in the fly ash from the LCB and USCB is lower, and the uranium content is higher than in fly ash, which is generated in combusted coal in Poland (according to reference [43]: content of Th = 25.9 ppm, U = 8.6 ppm; according to reference [47]: content of Th = 23.0 ppm, U= 10.6 ppm; shown in Tables 2 and 3). Compared to the combustion residues generated in other power plants (Tables 2 and 3), the Th and U contents in the studied fly ash are similar to fly ash from power plants in the USA (for Th) [48,49] and power plants in Brazil and China (for U) [39,46]. The Th content in the studied slag is similar to the Th content in the slag from other cited power plants, and the uranium content in the slag from the USCB feed coal is the same as in the slag from the Figueira power plant in Australia and Brazil [49,50], whereas from the LCB it is similar to the U content in the slag from power plants in China.…”
Section: Content and Distribution Of Th And U In Fly Ash And Slagmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Sixty percent of the bottom ash and fly ash produced in the United States is stored in piles, landfills, or holding ponds [15]. These open forms of storage allow the fine fly ash particles to be re-suspended into the ambient air, creating significant fugitive dust emissions.…”
Section: Use and Storage Of Coal Ashmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, trace elements initially found in the coal are not released, but instead concentrated into small coal ash particles [14]. The concentration of trace elements including nickel, vanadium, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, copper, zinc, lead, mercury, selenium, radon and molybdenum varies based on the amount originally contained in the coal [1,15].…”
Section: Background Information On Coal Ash a Coal Combustion Producmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fly ash is the largest component of coal ash and is characterized by fine incombustible, inorganic material (3,15). During the combustion process, residuals are carried in the flue gas pathway where some of the material will cool and condense into small, glassy spherules (15,16). Most of these small, spherical fly ash particles measure ≤ 10 µm in diameter and account for 40-70% of coal ash products.…”
Section: Background Coal Ash and Its Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%