2007
DOI: 10.1177/003335490712200502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lead-Contaminated Candies in Southern Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these laws reducing high blood lead levels (HBLLs) in children through conscientious and responsible public health efforts, today children in the U.S. remain continually at-risk for low blood lead level (LBLL) exposures that are still deemed to have concerning neurodevelopmental effects as the brain is particularly sensitive to low-levels of lead [3]. Currently, LBLL environmental exposures are acquired from residual industrial byproducts such as but not limited to: lead-painted toys [9,10]; lead-contaminated candies [11][12][13][14] and their wrappers; [15,16] unabated/improperly abated housing when renovating pre-1978 homes containing lead paint, lead-soldered and/or plumbing delivering water to pre-1978 homes, schools, and others institutions [17]. More recently, events such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Gold King Mine waste-water spill on 5 August 2015 in Silverton, Colorado [18] and Flint, Michigan's 2014 water supply re-routing program catastrophe [19,20] the causes, sources of exposure(s), the associated public health impacts/concerns, and more importantly the environmental social justice issues faced by surrounding populations of children across the U.S. defined as most-at-risk for resurgent lead poisoning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these laws reducing high blood lead levels (HBLLs) in children through conscientious and responsible public health efforts, today children in the U.S. remain continually at-risk for low blood lead level (LBLL) exposures that are still deemed to have concerning neurodevelopmental effects as the brain is particularly sensitive to low-levels of lead [3]. Currently, LBLL environmental exposures are acquired from residual industrial byproducts such as but not limited to: lead-painted toys [9,10]; lead-contaminated candies [11][12][13][14] and their wrappers; [15,16] unabated/improperly abated housing when renovating pre-1978 homes containing lead paint, lead-soldered and/or plumbing delivering water to pre-1978 homes, schools, and others institutions [17]. More recently, events such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Gold King Mine waste-water spill on 5 August 2015 in Silverton, Colorado [18] and Flint, Michigan's 2014 water supply re-routing program catastrophe [19,20] the causes, sources of exposure(s), the associated public health impacts/concerns, and more importantly the environmental social justice issues faced by surrounding populations of children across the U.S. defined as most-at-risk for resurgent lead poisoning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 A number of such cases have been reported on imported ethnic spices [5][6][7] and folk remedies. 8,9 These lead-tainted products are considered cultural sources of lead that play a role in lead exposure especially among the Hispanic migrant communities in the United States. 3 This case report illustrates lead's potential to contaminate seemingly innocuous products for children's consumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent survey of imported Latin American candies in Southern Nevada showed some imported candies to contain 1.46 ± 0.27 mg/kg lead in their wrappers and straws. 9 Research demonstrates that there seems to be no safe threshold for BLL in young children. 3 Some deleterious effects of lead exposure such as lowered IQ and socio-behavioral problems are still evident in children whose BLL is below 10 μg/dL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation