-1 ), DOM concentrations at the end of the experimental period (Day 14) increased 2.4 to 6.9%, and turnover time prolonged with a timescale of weeks to months. These potential shifts induced by Zn suggest that the allochthonous input of Zn into the coastal environment leads to suppression of energy flow in the microbial loop and enhances transport of DOM from coastal to offshore areas.
KEY WORDS: Zinc · Zn · DOM · Remineralisation · Bacterial abundance
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherAquat Microb Ecol 63: [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] 2011 higher concentrations of pollutants have been detected in coastal areas (Reddy et al. 2005, Cuong et al. 2008, Siddique et al. 2009) when compared to oceanic regions (Ellwood & Van den Berg 2000, Fukuda et al. 2000. Because some of the chemicals can alter biological activities (e.g. Pinto et al. 2003, Pereira et al. 2009), numerous researchers have focused on the toxic effects of such chemicals on organisms, including humans (e.g. Dell'Anno et al. 2003, Bielmyer et al. 2006, Thompson & Bannigan 2008, Mishra 2009). Based on their toxicity, it is recommended that the environmental concentrations of some chemicals be restricted to low levels (Bielmyer et al. 2006).Because zinc (Zn) is one of the heavy metals regarded as being less toxic to human health unless the concentration is abnormally high (Walsh et al. 1994), its concentration is loosely regulated (Water Quality Standards: 10 to 86 μg Zn l -1 ) (Chongprasith et al. 1999, Nagpal 1999, FDEP 2005, National Institute of Technology and Evaluation in Japan 2008), allowing considerable emissions of Zn from anthropogenic sources. In addition, much of the runoff of Zn occurs not only from human activity but also derives from natural environments (Hoshika & Shiozawa 1986). These findings indicate concentrations of Zn that are several orders of magnitude higher in many coastal environments when compared to other toxic heavy metals such as cadmium, copper and lead (Shitashima & Tsubota 1990, Reddy et al. 2005, Cuong et al. 2008).As mentioned above, Zn (compared with other heavy metals) is regarded as being a relatively less toxic element for humans and higher organisms, but it exerts a strong inhibitory effect on bacterial activity (Paulsson et al. 2000). Most studies on the effect of Zn on bacteria have been carried out in freshwater environments (Nweke et al. 2006, Vega-López et al. 2007; the results have shown a strong suppression of bacterial growth at low concentrations (> 0.1 μg Zn l -1 ), which is about an order of magnitude lower than the effective level on phytoplankton (Paulsson et al. 2000). Although there have been just a few studies on the effects of Zn on marine bacterial communities (Ku$pilić et al. 1989, Caroppo et al. 2006, RochelleNewall et al. 2008, these studies, too, have suggested that the activity of marine bacteria is also inhibited by the addition of Zn at 1 to 100 μg Zn l -1 . However, the impact on marine bacteria might be a little weak ...