1981
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330550304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lead in bone II: Skeletal‐lead content as an indicator of lifetime lead ingestion and the social correlates in an archaeological population

Abstract: Measurements of skeletal-lead content (by atomic absorption spectroscopy) were made for 16 individuals recovered from a Colonial (1670-1730) plantation cemetery in Virginia. Archaeological and historical evidence allowed the identification of two social groups (plantation proprietors and laborers) within this small population, each with vastly different estimated lifetime lead exposure, reflecting different living conditions. Measured bone-lead levels confirmed these differences. The character of plantation so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lead concentrations in the bone constantly increase with age in both sexes. The analysis of lead in bone specimens can be used to monitor lead contamination in human beings [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] . In this paper, we intended to evaluate the total amount of lead exposure and accumulation in populations using human bones excavated at archeological sites, however, a confounding problem is that bones are exposed to post-mortem absorption of lead in the ground [29][30][31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lead concentrations in the bone constantly increase with age in both sexes. The analysis of lead in bone specimens can be used to monitor lead contamination in human beings [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] . In this paper, we intended to evaluate the total amount of lead exposure and accumulation in populations using human bones excavated at archeological sites, however, a confounding problem is that bones are exposed to post-mortem absorption of lead in the ground [29][30][31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sites with relevant skeletal data include Colonial ironworker slaves at College Landing, Maryland (Kelly and Angel, 1983), Colonial whites in Virginia (Kelly and Angel, 1981), and 19th-century free blacks at College Landing, Virginia (Hudgins, 1977). Aufderheide et al (1981Aufderheide et al ( , 1985 found considerable variation in lead content from skeletal analysis of these samples and at Clift's Plantation in Virginia and suggest an economic and occupational explanation. Relatively high lead burdens and gender differentials for developmental stress and timing of periods of ill health for small samples of white elite and black slaves at an 18th-century South Carolina plantation have been evaluated in relation to socioeconomic status effects on health (Rathbun and Scurry, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As previously noted, most of the lead which contaminates air, soil, and water is derived from industrial activities. Except for results obtained in individuals of the Roman Empire, only a few samples from the preindustrial era may have high bone lead values (Aufderheide et al, 1981), but these results are usually explained in relation to preparation or storage of food in leaden containers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%