2010
DOI: 10.4081/nr.2010.e8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lead Nephropathy: Revisiting an Overlooked Cause of Kidney Disease

Abstract: Despite the recognition of lead nephropathy as a consequence of environmental and occupational lead exposure, lead nephropathy still appears to be underrecognized by physicians as a cause and promoter of chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in people with more apparent causative factors such as diabetes and hypertension. This review focuses on the clinical, pathophysiological and epidemiological perspectives of lead nephropathy with the objective of promoting the awareness of this important but overlooked … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(293 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition other factors like the varying dose of lead used in the studies and the diverse level of lead exposure from acute, sub-acute and chronic may also account for the differences as the study duration in the work of Al-Attar et al [26] was 7 weeks, 10 weeks for the study by Salem et al [25], acute low level exposure for below 2 weeks by Ishiak et al [28], 1 week by Andjelkovic et al [27] and chronic low exposure of 3 months by Odigie et al [29]. In addition the differing results could also be explained by the recognition that serum urea and creatinine are less reliable markers of lead induced kidney damage as indicated by other reports [30] [31] [32] and the sample size limitations due to the ethical limitations for large animal sample population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition other factors like the varying dose of lead used in the studies and the diverse level of lead exposure from acute, sub-acute and chronic may also account for the differences as the study duration in the work of Al-Attar et al [26] was 7 weeks, 10 weeks for the study by Salem et al [25], acute low level exposure for below 2 weeks by Ishiak et al [28], 1 week by Andjelkovic et al [27] and chronic low exposure of 3 months by Odigie et al [29]. In addition the differing results could also be explained by the recognition that serum urea and creatinine are less reliable markers of lead induced kidney damage as indicated by other reports [30] [31] [32] and the sample size limitations due to the ethical limitations for large animal sample population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, lead has detrimental effects on the central nervous system of the developing infant [4,5]. Although neurotoxicity has the most sensitive endpoint, lead can also cause blood pressure, affect kidney function, cause mutagenesis and have reproductive effects [6]. Due to its toxicity, lead must be quantified in aqueous media with a view to controlling its use in several areas of human activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that Pb exposure increased the excretion of amino acids and glucose in urine due to its toxic effect on the proximal convoluted portion of the nephron (Loghman-Adham, 1997). Long-term Pb exposure causes kidney failure, increased blood uric acid concentration, high blood pressure, and joint infection (Alasia, 2010). The highest amounts of Pb (about 1/3rd of the entire body) were accumulated in the liver (Mudipalli, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%