2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lead removal from aqueous solution by natural and pretreated clinoptilolite: Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
362
2
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 945 publications
(390 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
17
362
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates a decrease in adsorption, which is attributed due to the lack of available active sites required for the high initial concentration of AB. Similar results have been reported in literature on the extent of removal of dyes, metal ions and carboxylic acids [8]. The optimum initial concentration of AB solution was fixed for various adsorption systems Table 1.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This indicates a decrease in adsorption, which is attributed due to the lack of available active sites required for the high initial concentration of AB. Similar results have been reported in literature on the extent of removal of dyes, metal ions and carboxylic acids [8]. The optimum initial concentration of AB solution was fixed for various adsorption systems Table 1.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…11,12 The effect of converting the zeolite initially to a homoionic form for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater has been studied by many authors. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] These authors pointed out that zeolite in homoionic forms exhibits a significantly increased ability to remove heavy metals from wastewater. NaCl is most often used as the pretreatment agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen from Table 8, coefficients gained from the both the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models, it is evident that the pseudo-second-order-model fits the best. From Table 8, it is obvious that the R 2 values of the pseudo-second-order kinetic model are much higher than that of pseudo-first-order-kinetic-model and it experienced a consistent increase with the concentration compared to the values of the pseudo-first-order kinetic model [55]. Table 8.…”
Section: (9)mentioning
confidence: 91%