Leader corruption depends on power and testosterone

Abstract

We used incentivized experimental games to manipulate leader power-the number of followers and the discretion leaders had to enforce their will. Leaders had complete autonomy in deciding payouts to themselves and their followers. Although leaders could make prosocial decisions to benefit the public good they could also abuse their power by invoking antisocial decisions, which reduced the total payouts to the group but increased leader's earnings. In Study 1 (N = 478), we found that both amount of followers and discretionary choices independently predicted leader corruption. In Study 2 (N = 240), we examined how power and individual differences (e.g., personality, hormones) affected leader corruption over time; power interacted with testosterone in predicting corruption, which was highest when leader power and baseline testosterone were both high. Honesty predicted initial level of leader antisocial decisions; however, honesty did not shield leaders from the corruptive effect of power.

Business Ethics: The Promise of Neuroscience

“…The release of different hormones in the human body has been related to social outcomes such as trust (oxytocin), aggressive behavior and power (testosterone), or altruism (dopamine) (Fehr, 2008;Kosfeld et al, 2005;Schultheiss and Stanton, 2009;Schultheiss et al, 2004). Research more directly related to business ethics investigated the role of testosterone in leader corruption (Bendahan et al, 2015) and utilitarian moral decision making (Carney and Mason, 2010).…”

Perceptions of Corruption: An Empirical Study Controlling for Survey Bias

“…i Academic definitions similarly stress the powermisuse element of corruption (Bendahan et al, 2014).…”

Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice

“…These researchers studied how interpersonal power-the perception that one has the discretion to asymmetrically enforce one's will over the outcomes of others (Sturm & Antonakis, 2015)-could affect advice taking. Power enhances individuals' self-serving behavior (Bendahan, Zehnder, Pralong, & Antonakis, 2015), as well as confidence in their beliefs and their willingness to take risks (Fast, Sivanathan, Mayer, & Galinsky, 2012), and thus it overlaps in this respect with narcissism (e.g., Anderson, John, & Keltner, 2012). As a consequence, when See et al (2011) and Tost et al (2012) manipulated power, they found that it was positively related to confidence, which in turn was negatively related to advice taking.…”