Leader-follower congruence in loneliness, LMX and turnover intention

Abstract

Purpose – Research on workplace loneliness has thus far been dominated by perceptions of followers; hence, few researchers have considered the perspective of leader-follower congruence. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the leader-follower relationship mediates the relationship between leader-follower congruence/incongruence in workplace loneliness and turnover intentions. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 232 leader-follower dyads from ten companies in China. Polynomial regression combined with the response surface methodology was used to test the hypotheses. Findings – Four conclusions were drawn. First, leader-member exchange (LMX) was higher when leaders and followers were aligned in terms of workplace loneliness than otherwise. Second, in the case of leader-follower congruence, LMX rose as their workplace loneliness fell. Third, in the case of incongruence, followers had lower LMX when they were lonelier than their leaders. Finally, LMX partially mediated the leader-follower congruence/incongruence effect of workplace loneliness on followers’ turnover intention. Originality/value – This study emphasized the importance of leaders’ congruence with followers in workplace loneliness. Additionally, it extended research on leader-follower congruence from a positive perspective to a negative one.

The Effects of Supervisor’s Organizational Embodiment and Organizational Identification on the LMX-Creativity Relationship

“…a collectivist country, Data collection from different departments like personnel, mechanical, electrical, despatch, and research department ensured the relevance, variance, and normality of data (Schyns & Wolfram, 2008). Literature recommended sample size of about 400 for a population of one million (Sekaran & Bougie, 2016), however previous research on LMX sufficed a sample above 200 (Chen, Wen, Peng, & Liu, 2016). We approached the approximate 700 white collar participants using convenient sampling, self-administration and time-lagged data collection (3 weeks) method (Ansari, Bui Bui, & Aafaqi, 2007).…”

The Effect of Workplace Loneliness on Silence Behavior

“…Workplace loneliness. Based on the scale of workplace loneliness compiled by Wright et al (2006), Chinese scholars Peng et al (2017) and Chen et al (2016) translated the Chinese version of the questionnaire by program and conducted the research in China, and the internal consistency coefficient is also ideal, respectively 0.87, 0.88. Thus, we adopted the Chinese version of the questionnaire for research, including 16 questions in this study.…”

“…Emotional deprivation refers to the fact that employees' attachment needs are not satisfied because their interpersonal relationship in the organization is defective in quantity or quality, which will lead to their emotional indifference and numbness. Lack of sense of membership refers to employees' lack of sense of belonging and identity to the organization, which will lead to employees' disconnection from the network of organizational relations and a sense of alienation from other members of the organization (Wright, 2005;Wright et al, 2006;Lam & Lau, 2012;Chen et al, 2016). When employees experience such loneliness in the workplace, employees will perceive poor interpersonal exchange with team members, as well as team members' alienation from them.…”

“…Workplace loneliness, has been a common feeling of the current workplace staff. As a common negative emotion in the workplace, workplace loneliness will bring a series of negative effects on employees and organizations L. Guo (Ozcelik & Barsade, 2018;Peng, Chen, Xia, & Ran, 2017;Chen, Wen, Peng, & Liu, 2016). Despite the unprecedented opportunities and dilemmas that lie ahead of us today, emotional needs, the truest desires of the human heart, have never changed.…”

The Effect of Implicit–Explicit Followership Congruence on Benevolent Leadership: Evidence from Chinese Family Firms

“…Thus, we needed to translate the English scales into Chinese so as to make them understood by the participants. In the process, we took translation/back translation procedures ( Brislin, 1986 ) 1 because the method had been widely used in studies in this regard in non-English speaking countries ( Chen et al, 2016 ).…”