1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1048-9843(99)80009-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
537
1
12

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 615 publications
(564 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
14
537
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Each branch manager was asked to provide his or her own ratings of the relationship with each of his or her individual subordinates within the branch. This measurement is consistent with the past LMX research, which conceptualizes and assesses LMX as a dyadic individual-level variable for analytical purposes (see Schriesheim, Castro, & Cogliser, 1999).Sample items included "To what extent do you understand work problems and needs of the employee" and "To what extent do you recognize the potential of the employee". The alpha reliability for this scale was .87.…”
Section: Leader-member Exchangementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Each branch manager was asked to provide his or her own ratings of the relationship with each of his or her individual subordinates within the branch. This measurement is consistent with the past LMX research, which conceptualizes and assesses LMX as a dyadic individual-level variable for analytical purposes (see Schriesheim, Castro, & Cogliser, 1999).Sample items included "To what extent do you understand work problems and needs of the employee" and "To what extent do you recognize the potential of the employee". The alpha reliability for this scale was .87.…”
Section: Leader-member Exchangementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Building on existing theory (e.g., Bandura, 1986;Schneider, 1975), I argue that psychological and work group climate signal the preferred achievement orientation and compel group members to adopt a commensurate state goal orientation. I incorporate the concept of LMX-that is, the quality of exchange relationship between the work group leader and a particular employee (Schriesheim, Castro, & Cogliser, 1999)-as an individual-level moderating process that provides a MS# 2003 means to clarify leader cues in creating group members' psychological climate and internalize these cues in state goal orientation emergence.…”
Section: Understanding the Emergence Of State Goal Orientation In Orgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback is information on a person's (or a team's) performance, and consists of what someone is doing or has done, and how well they are doing or have done it (Sims et al 1976;Schriesheim et al 1999). It is important to receive feedback in order to permit a team to maintain behaviour that will allow it to meet targets.…”
Section: Leadership and Performance Of Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesis 2.5 is therefore supported by this study. The literature points to the importance of providing employees with feedback or information about how well the team is performing (Sims et al 1976;Schriesheim et al 1999). This study confirms this conclusion: awareness of performance is associated with actual performance.…”
Section: Role Of the Team Leadermentioning
confidence: 99%