1985
DOI: 10.3102/00346543055001087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader Succession in School Settings

Abstract: Conventional wisdom maintains that changing administrators will improve school performance. Some research evidence suggests, however, that because leader succession is disruptive to communication, decisionmaking and power processes, it will have either no causal effect or a negative effect on organizational effectiveness. Even if the impacts are modest, leader succession produces a naturally occurring set of events that provides excellent opportunities for researchers to assess administrator effects on school … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
40
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These stages are similar to the stage frameworks reviewed by Miskel and Cosgrove (1985), but they add an important dimension-the interaction of multidirectional effects shaping the process and outcomes of succession. These stages are similar to the stage frameworks reviewed by Miskel and Cosgrove (1985), but they add an important dimension-the interaction of multidirectional effects shaping the process and outcomes of succession.…”
Section: Stages Of Socializationmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These stages are similar to the stage frameworks reviewed by Miskel and Cosgrove (1985), but they add an important dimension-the interaction of multidirectional effects shaping the process and outcomes of succession. These stages are similar to the stage frameworks reviewed by Miskel and Cosgrove (1985), but they add an important dimension-the interaction of multidirectional effects shaping the process and outcomes of succession.…”
Section: Stages Of Socializationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Nicholson and West (1988), Feldman (1976), and Wanous (1980) offered stage frameworks marking the organizational socialization of successors. Analogous to the prearrival stage in some traditional succession frameworks (Miskel & Cosgrove, 1985), it also includes looking forward to promotions or new assignments. Because managers experience multiple successions, each involving a new organizational socialization, they move continually through anticipation, encounter, and stabilization in succeeding settings.…”
Section: Stages Of Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different methodologies may be appropriate for studying CEO succession. However, Miskel and Cosgrove (1984) recommended three longitudinal methods. First, they believed that case studies resulted In useful Insights concerning CEO succession and institutional leadership.…”
Section: Case Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a limited existing literature on leadership succession in education. Miskel and Cosgrove (1985) contributed to the literature from the secondary level of education suggesting leadership change -may have only marginal effects on subsequent school processes, structures, and outcomes‖ (p. 100). Birnbaum's (1989) work addressed presidential succession in higher education.…”
Section: Leadership Succession and Presidential Transition In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research of Miskel and Cosgrove (1985) and Birnbaum (1989) point to few changes in institutional functioning when succession occurs. Kirkland and Ratcliff (1994) completed case studies looking at four presidential transitions at community colleges.…”
Section: Leadership Succession and Presidential Transition In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%