Leader succession research presents intriguing evidence that leader succession affects school performance. Organizational socialization provides equally tantalizing evidence that leaders are shaped in their organizations. Socialization illuminates processes through which the outcomes of succession can be improved by successors and their superiors. The dynamic interactions among social and personal factors examined by socialization theories, however, are underemphasized by traditional succession frameworks. This omission leaves important gaps in knowledge about leader succession processes and outcomes. A synthesis of traditional succession and socialization research frameworks provides an enriched view of leader succession that can be applied to the study of principal succession, role change, and reform in schools. The literature in organizational socialization and professional socialization applicable to this synthesis is reviewed and compared with earlier succession reviews. Research issues raised by the socialization perspective are discussed.Leader succession, the process of replacing key officials in organizations, occurs frequently. Some estimate that principal turnover is as high as 7%-10% per year (Weindling & Earley, 1987). Others report that a manager will change leadership assignments six to eight times in a career (Gabarro, 1987). In addition to the impending succession of principals (Baltzell & Dentler, 1983; Miskel & Cosgrove, 1985), new opportunities for teacher leadership make leader succession an important force in the social dynamics of schools (Hart, 1990a). Succession is a "disruptive event [that] changes the line of communication, realigns relationships of power, affects decisionmaking, and generally disturbs the equilibrium of normal activities" (Miskel & Cosgrove, 1985, p. 88).The social nature of succession receives uneven attention in research, but this has not always been the case. The earliest succession studies (Gouldner, 1954;Grusky, 1960Grusky, , 1963Grusky, , 1969 revealed how groups interpret leader succession using metaphors such as ritual scapegoating and the Rebecca myth (the idealization of the predecessor-drawn from the Daphne Du Maurier novel, Rebecca). More recently, phrases like status degradation (Gephart, 1978) illuminate the social processes leading to succession. Some scholars go so far as to insist that the major function of leaders is to interpret the symbolic domain of organizations (Pfeffer, 1978(Pfeffer, , 1981. According to the symbolic purists, leaders have no substantive function.In schools, too, researchers examine the symbolic and cultural dimension of succession. Firestone (1989; Firestone & Bader, in press) found that the current enthusiasm for cultural leadership as a solution to school problems may not be warranted. His study of the cultural politics of superintendent succession revealed leaders vulnerable to the influence of powerful social forces. Roberts (in press-a) concluded after studying succession in 12 high schools that cultural leadership was none...