Leadership and credition: Followers' neural response to leaders who are perceived as transformational

Bergner, Sabine; Rybnicek, Robert; Koschutnig, Karl

doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.943896

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…But it also can be supportive when one intends to talk about believing processes in a more general way. This might happen in different communicational contexts, as for instance in counselling (Wagner-Skacel 2022), pedagogics (Mitropoulou 2017, Mitropoulou et al 2018, law (Marko 2017), economy (Sturn 2017;Willfort and Weber 2017;Bergner et al 2022), technics (Hick et al 2020;Kranabitl et al 2021), ecology and sustainability (Zimmermann and Angel 2016;Angel and Zimmermann. 2016;Oviedo et al 2022), Christian theology (Oancea 2017; Davies 2022; Angel 2022c), or Buddhism (Forman 2022).…”

Section: Communication Model (Model Of Credition)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Fluid Theodicy

Angel

2024

SetF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The term theodicy was coined by the philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) and is inherent in the question of how evil can exist if an intrinsically good God guides everything. The publication of this oeuvre initiated intense philosophical and theological discourse in the subsequent centuries, during which many issues that bare upon human well-being were articulated. Also, Leibniz’s rational approach to the relationship between God and evil raised a number of issues related to the topic of belief. This topic has entangled discourses on theodicy with a long-lasting debate on beliefs, which goes back to Antiquity. Recently, a paradigm-shift shed new light on the understanding of belief. Science has begun to address the neurophysiological mechanisms of the processes that underpin belief formation, modulation, and change. The term credition was coined in order to capture and reflect this new and innovative understanding of the fluidity of beliefs and believing. This paper presents various features of a pattern of interrelationships between well-being, theodicy, and credition.

show abstract