2000
DOI: 10.1080/02188791.2000.10600183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership and Culture in Chinese Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
87
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have specifically looked at educational leadership in the mainland of China in recent years (Bush & Qiang, 2000;Feng, 2002;Ribbins & Zhang, 2004. A number of scholars (e.g., Chen, 1995;Seagrave, 1995;Wong, 2001a) suggest that there are certain historical-social influences on the development of leadership practice in China, such as Taoism, Confucianism and the strategic thinking of Sunzi.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some have specifically looked at educational leadership in the mainland of China in recent years (Bush & Qiang, 2000;Feng, 2002;Ribbins & Zhang, 2004. A number of scholars (e.g., Chen, 1995;Seagrave, 1995;Wong, 2001a) suggest that there are certain historical-social influences on the development of leadership practice in China, such as Taoism, Confucianism and the strategic thinking of Sunzi.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These dual authorities normally come together through a school management committee in which the different entities assemble weekly to review performance. This feature requires that school principals regularly consult with local government and party officials as well as teachers, developing a close relationship between political and educational aspects of school management (Bush & Qiang, 2002;Lewin, Little, Xu, & Zheng, 1994;Tang & Wu, 2000). However, principals are still responsible for making sure that the specified educational objectives are reached no matter what level of authority is granted to the position.…”
Section: The Educational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicates that local governments and schools will be encouraged to innovate and test new management methods, and expand the scope of school autonomy. Aims, policy, and curricula are primarily formed at both the national and local levels of government (Bush, Coleman, & Xiaohong, 1998;Bush & Qiang, 2002).…”
Section: The Educational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In leadership discourse, Bush and Qiang (2000) use concepts of power distance, uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientations for educational leadership in Chinese societies. While Hallinger and Leithwood (1996) highlighted the traits of dedication, discipline, strong will and persistence as higher priorities for moral codes of behavior in China, Walker and Dimmock (2000) emphasized collectivism, authority and patriarchy.…”
Section: Issues Of Educational Leadership In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%