Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms

Abstract

Construct proliferation in the leadership field raises questions concerning parsimony and whether we should focus on joint mechanisms of leadership styles, rather than the differences between them. In this theoretical research article, we propose that positive leadership styles translate into similar leader behaviors on the work floor that influence employee work engagement through a number of shared pathways. We take a deductive approach and review several established theories as well as relevant up-to-date empirical work from a bird’s-eye view to generate a general framework. We introduce a model with three processes (one direct process and two indirect processes) and five pathways (practical, motivational, affective, cognitive, and behavioral). With regard to the indirect processes, we propose that work characteristics (material pathway) and psychological need satisfaction (intrapersonal motivational pathway) mediate the relationship between positive leadership styles and engagement. Regarding the direct interpersonal process, we propose that leaders directly influence employee engagement through three pathways: emotional contagion (affective interpersonal pathway), social exchange (cognitive interpersonal pathway), and role modeling (behavioral interpersonal pathway). Our parsimonious research model furthers the integration of different theoretical viewpoints as well as underscores joint mechanisms with regard to the effect of positive leadership styles. Practically speaking, this article also provides insight into which processes leaders can work on to stimulate employee work engagement through progressive policies and work practices.

The Buffering Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on the Relationship Between Work Engagement and Turnover Intention

“…The current study uncovered that academician engagement is positively connected to turnover intention (Oruh et al, 2019;Gadi & Kee, 2020). Given these outcomes, scholars have suggested the need to focused on avenues to enhance individual engagement (Decuypere & Schaufeli, 2019). To unearth the assumptions of engagement, the likelihood that the correlation linking engagement and turnover intention changes as an act of a moderating construct needs to be researched in the Nigerian context.…”

Basic psychological need satisfaction mediates the relationship between engaging leadership and work engagement: A cross‐national study

“…Leaders are important agents to nurture and manage work engagement among their employees. A recent meta‐analysis found that various leadership styles are positively related to work engagement, such as ethical leadership ( k = 9; ρ = .58), transformational leadership ( k = 36; ρ = .46), servant leadership ( k = 3; ρ = .43), authentic leadership ( k = 17; ρ = .38), and empowering leadership ( k = 4; ρ = .35) (DeCuypere & Schaufeli, ). Although these leadership styles are related to work engagement, in‐depth knowledge about the underlying mechanism is still lacking.…”

The influence of business ethics and community outreach on faculty engagement: the mediating effect of legitimacy in higher education

“…Stakeholder's involvement and active participation is also a key factor for employee engagement, since being part of the organization strategy and narrative helps the employee identification and feeling of belonging, which are important intangible assets for all kinds of organizations. Employee engagement is positively linked to better performance, higher customer loyalty, well-being and lower turnover (Decuypere and Schaufeli, 2020). Gallup (2017) shows that engaged faculty and staff members are critical to student success, since being emotionally and psychologically committed to their work helps students overcome the difficulties and anxiety they face.…”