2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership competency models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Garavan and McGuire (2001) distinguish a US and a UK/EU perspective on the conceptualisation of competencies, both referring to characteristics of individuals, but with the US perspective emphasising a cognitive view on learning with objective measurements and the UK or European perspective emphasising a constructivist approach to learning with subjective and motivational dimensions of learning (Garavan/McGuire 2001). We agree with the latter position and therefore emphasise the need to include learning in the model and also the interaction between the individual and the situation (see Hollenbeck/ McCall/Silzer 2006).…”
Section: The Gmc Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Garavan and McGuire (2001) distinguish a US and a UK/EU perspective on the conceptualisation of competencies, both referring to characteristics of individuals, but with the US perspective emphasising a cognitive view on learning with objective measurements and the UK or European perspective emphasising a constructivist approach to learning with subjective and motivational dimensions of learning (Garavan/McGuire 2001). We agree with the latter position and therefore emphasise the need to include learning in the model and also the interaction between the individual and the situation (see Hollenbeck/ McCall/Silzer 2006).…”
Section: The Gmc Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Such frameworks may perpetuate established practices and prior assumptions about the concept of leadership, rather allowing flexibility and challenge of the status quo. 18 It has been stressed that these descend from a "great man" concept of leadership, 19 reinforcing the importance of the individual instead of a more collective, organisational, and contextual leadership suggested in recent theory. 20 Bolden et al reviewed a significant number of private sector, public sector, and generic frameworks, finding many similarities.…”
Section: Setting Learning Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…31 Notwithstanding the time worth spending on teaching factual knowledge, the bulk of development happens through the experience of leadership roles and is founded on experiential and reflective learning theory. According to Boud et al, reflection encompasses all "intellectual and affective activities in which individuals engage to explore their experiences in order to lead to new understandings" (p. 19). 32 Kolb's concept of experiential learning is quite similar: "the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience" (p. 38).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once awareness is created, the individual can work to close the gaps through various experiences, training, or mentoring. Although individual work is necessary, it remains inadequate by failing to address context or holistic organizational issues, strengthen the network or build capacity for change (Hollenbeck et al 2006;James et al 2007). Development must occur over time in an iterative manner, be grounded in experience, and foster reflection not only individually but collectively (Conger 2004;Connaughton et al 2003;Daudelin 1996;McCall 2004;Torbert 1994).…”
Section: Leadership Development and Action Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%