Leadership lessons untold: A new history of Robert McNamara’s World Bank

Abstract

Leadership education can be reductionist and facile. Recent scholarship in management and organizational history has reexamined many of the most established business school concepts and literatures, rethinking the ‘lessons’ taught from – among others – Taylor, Maslow and the Human Relations School. This study similarly uses historical methods (oral historical and archival) to analyse the career of Robert S. McNamara, a major figure often portrayed simplistically in leadership literature. McNamara is often characterized as a ‘good manager but poor leader’, notorious for failures associated with micromanaging by questionable metrics. While this picture is partially accurate, it is far from complete. McNamara’s career – for all its management failures and weaknesses – also featured many traits associated with celebrated concepts of ‘leadership’, especially during his long tenure as President of the World Bank (1968–81). We develop an historical narrative that reevaluates and updates our understanding of this comparatively unexplored latter stage of McNamara’s career. The article argues against the construction of simplistic ‘leadership lessons’ that suffer from three weaknesses: (1) a poor grasp of historical events, (2) a weak understanding of history as a discipline and (3) a reliance on artificial constructs and dichotomies, such as leadership (good) versus management (bad). We suggest that there is much to learn from deepening the scholarly relationship between critical leadership studies and management history.

Does Laboratory Matters in Today’s High School Learning Environment?

“…School strict administration may influence a subconscious encouragement to the teacher in order to meet the expected criteria lined by the upper administrative person. However, in management field, this may sound unrelated with common knowledge, as excessive burden might bring bad influence to the employee (in this case, teachers) (Heath & McCann, 2021;Milligan et al, 2022;Milosevic et al, 2020) On the other hand, public schools might rely more on traditional lecture-based approaches, potentially impacting students' ability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios tested (Elfaki et al, 2019), especially in the biology test. Our observation and note from teachers' response revealed that due to the teaching experience, many express that their main achievement is to earn the certification or work experience as the basic requirement of public service registration.…”

Leadership, Employee and Competency Development for Better Talent Management in the Face of the Dynamics of Environmental Changes

“…A multidimensional look at process management allowed Bitkowska (2019, pp. [130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139] to distinguish the following areas of IPM: -dimension: strategic fit, -dimension: corporate governance, -dimension: technologies and tools, -dimension: structure and culture, -dimension: human resources.…”

“…The discussion presented in this chapter is a continuation of various aspects of organizational leadership analysis, which is a complex issue dependent on many factors (Heath and McCann, 2021), the third one tackling formal issuesthe purposeful and rational impact of the organization on shaping leadership relationships and talent management practices. This chapter, in accordance with the character of the book, focuses specifically on the coexistence of formal solutions in the field of talent management and the development of leadership qualities and skills in the context of important aspects of business competitiveness.…”

Effect of Despotic Leadership on the Employee Work Withdrawal Behavior and Acquiescent Silence

“…Thus, over the years, Leadership has been under the radar of social scientists. For instance, an enormous amount of Literature is available on leadership which is studied under the lens of different theoretical foundations (Asif et al, 2020;Heath & McCann, 2021;Lee et al, 2020;Witzel, 2019). The earlier belief for studying leadership was to identify the physical, intellectual, and behavioral characteristics of successful leaders and provide them the opportunity to lead others (Deichmann & Stam, 2015;Zhang et al, 2021).…”