“…Twenty-five studies (16%) were concerned with understanding the experience or perception of professional identity (9) (Elvey et al, 2013 ; Fagermoen, 1997 ; Kantek & Şimşek, 2017 ; Kluijtmans et al, 2017 ; MacIntosh, 2002 , 2003 ; Ngai, 2007 ; Niemi & Paasivaara, 2007 ; Peter et al, 2018 ), its construction or influences on its development (9) (Chow et al, 2018 ; Dombeck, 2003 ; Estrella, 2010 ; Fagermoen, 1995 ; Fitzgerald & Teal, 2004 ; Hinojosa, 2012 ; Hinojosa & Carney, 2016 ; Kumpusalo et al, 1994 ; Real et al, 2009 ), the role of the organisational identity in professional identity (4) (Barbour & Lammers, 2015 ; Chang, 2012 ; Curtis & Day, 2013 ; Salvatore et al, 2018 ); and the role of emotion (1) (Cascón-Pereira & Hallier, 2012 ). Boundary crossing, both the impact on and role of professional identity was the reason behind of 19 or 12% of studies being conducted (Berghout et al, 2020 ; Brosnan & Cribb, 2019 ; Devery et al, 2018 ; Divall, 2015 ; Ferrell, 2017 ; Koskiniemi et al, 2019 ; Kunhunny & Salmon, 2017 ; Martin et al, 2020 ; McKenzie & Williamson, 2016 ; McNamara, 2010 ; Meyer et al, 2015 ; Ng et al, 2018 ; Ogilvie, 2012 ; Ong et al, 2019 ; Owens, 2018 ; Pape et al, 2018 ; Pottie et al, 2009 ; Pratt et al, 2006 ; Reyes Villagomeza, 2019 ) including both boundary crossing to academia and clinical teaching and hybrid roles, particularly clinical-management roles. The impact of education and learning, qualifications and credentials on professional identity and professional capital was investigated in 12 or 8% of studies (Arai et al, 2017 ; Beckett & Gough, 2004 ; Beddoe, 2013 , 2...…”