Leadership, mobilization of risky behaviours and accountability: The Church of Greece leaders' public talk during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract

Social psychologists have typically examined leadership and risk‐taking behaviours through a social identity lens. However, the rhetorical/ideological aspects of such processes as well as leaders' accountability management practices have not been adequately studied. We address this gap by focusing on leaders of the Church of Greece (CoG), who, at the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic, insisted that their congregation should keep receiving the Holy Communion, which typically involves the practice of spoon‐sharing. We present a discursive analysis of 17 interviews with leaders of the CoG given in Greek media channels, exploring how they construct participation in the ritual. When Church leaders urged their audiences to engage in risky practices, they assumed various social identity positions (e.g. scientifically informed; civic minded), implicating competing ideological frameworks. They also managed their personal and institutional accountability for potential viral transmissions by placing responsibility for adverse effects on their followers. Implications for social psychological theory are discussed.

A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack

“…In a phrase, Trump does not demand violence, but he does enable it. This is not surprising, especially when considering that leaders can recognize and manage accountability concerns when enabling particular courses of action (see Ntontis et al, 2023).…”

“…Considering the textual nature of our data, and our focus on the rhetorical construction of group identities, our analysis is primarily informed by the rhetorical approach commonly taken by researchers in the social identity tradition (e.g. Drury & Reicher, 2000;Mols et al, 2022;Ntontis et al, 2023;Reicher et al, 2006;Reicher & Hopkins, 1996, 2001. This approach can be seen as a form of hybrid thematic analysis, combining deductive (theory driven) and inductive (data driven) approaches (Braun & Clarke, 2022;Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006).…”

Impresarios of identity: How the leaders of Czechoslovakia's ‘Candlelight Demonstration’ enabled effective collective action in a context of repression

“…First, we were careful to frame the discussion in ways that diminished the importance of self‐presentational concerns (what discursive psychologists call these ‘accountability concerns’ – see Edwards & Potter, 1992; Ntontis et al, 2023). Thus, we made clear that the leaders' accounts would be anonymous.…”