Leadership Refrains: Patterns of Leadership

Abstract

This article considers issues of leadership and leadership development by reflecting on the notion of the refrain as pattern. Drawing on our research of leadership within UK further education (FE) we examine how tracing ‘patterns of leadership’ can provide an insight into the practical accomplishment of leadership in FE as everyday ‘ordinary’ work. In an era of increased change and uncertainty about the character of leadership within the sector, we use our ethnographic data and interdisciplinary backgrounds to consider leadership development as essentially a design problem through adopting and adapting the notion of patterns that emerge in the architectural work of Christopher Alexander and the organizational studies of Tom Erickson. In doing so we point to the comforting effect of both the refrain and the pattern to repeat, return, renew, react, refine, reconstruct and resolve. We conclude by suggesting some of the ways in which the documenting and describing of such patterns of leadership can be used as ‘teachable moments’ for the design and deployment of programmes of leadership development and training.

Introducing blended learning: An experience of uncertainty for students in the United Arab Emirates

“…To structure the blended environment towards less ambiguity for students, there is an opportunity to post asynchronous ''diagnostic feedback'', on why answers are wrong, and ''prescriptive feedback'', on how the answers could be improved for next time (Eom, Wen, and Ashill 2006, p. 220). Although an educator risks student uncertainty, because of less structured pedagogy, employment preparation is of concern as more structure is considered to stifle innovation in the workplace (Kelly et al 2006;Shane 1995).…”

Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process

“…The more constructionist the ODA scholar, the more likely are they to believe that, following Wittgenstein (1953), leadership is one of those "blurred concepts," and following Gallie (1956), an essentially contested one because leadership will always be in the eye of the beholder. The more constructionist scholar believes it is better to view leadership as a family resemblance among language games (Kelly, 2008;Wittgenstein, 1953) where leadership becomes a "design problem" for the actors involved (Kelly, White, Martin, & Rouncefield, 2006). That is, leaders must figure out what leadership is in the context of what they do and, through their framing and actions, persuade themselves and other people that they are doing it (Fairhurst, 2011;Grint, 2000).…”

Leadership in Africa: rethinking development

“…It is believed that such creative experimentation is not only needful, but indeed may well be a pre-requisite necessary to evolve more contextually robust knowledge frameworks. Pursuing this approach, mainstream leadership theory would therefore be critically and comparatively examined with a view to creatively appropriating these in the socio-cultural context of "those who must practice it", in a way that is not only recognisable to them, but that is contextually resonant of their lived and experienced forms of work (Kelly et al, 2006;. I argue that this is a missing component from the design of contemporary leadership development interventions; not only contextualizing "knowledges" but more specifically, addressing the practical question of "how I can apply it here and now" or better still as Ladkin et al (2009) have noted, maintaining the awareness that leadership development must indeed make contextual sense to the intending user.…”