2019
DOI: 10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leading Change in Teacher Education: Balancing on the Wobbly Bridge of School-University Partnership

Abstract: Initial teacher education (ITE) programmes have been critiqued widely for failing to connect educational theory with everyday practices in schools. More meaningful collaborations between schools and teacher education providers have featured prominently among key recommendations addressing the traditional theory-practice divide. This paper traces and critically analyses one 'simplex' story of initiating and leading a large-scale school-university partnership (SUP) network in the Republic of Ireland. Using a nar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
30
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Teacher education programmes in the Irish context have historically worked hard to bridge the theory/practice divide (Harford and MacRuairc 2008;Heinz and Fleming 2019;la Velle 2019;McGarr, O'Grady, and Guilfoyle 2017) and promote 'inquiry as a stance' (Cochran-Smith and Lytle 2009), yet their efforts will only succeed if this is a joint endeavour through 'democratic pedagogical partnership' (Farrell 2021) with schools. However, in the Irish context, these agreements are dominated by HEIs and state agencies and the democratic involvement of the practice field in framing such agreements is often conspicuously absent.…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teacher education programmes in the Irish context have historically worked hard to bridge the theory/practice divide (Harford and MacRuairc 2008;Heinz and Fleming 2019;la Velle 2019;McGarr, O'Grady, and Guilfoyle 2017) and promote 'inquiry as a stance' (Cochran-Smith and Lytle 2009), yet their efforts will only succeed if this is a joint endeavour through 'democratic pedagogical partnership' (Farrell 2021) with schools. However, in the Irish context, these agreements are dominated by HEIs and state agencies and the democratic involvement of the practice field in framing such agreements is often conspicuously absent.…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teacher education, which suffers from a 'status problem' (Labaree 2008) in universities relative to other disciplines, occupies a somewhat liminal space in HE. It is governed by and must work within the requirements of managerialist performativity, and yet, like other professionally-oriented disciplines, connections to and relationships with the community (in ITE's case, with schools, teachers, and students) are fundamental to its ethos and practice (Heinz and Fleming 2019). As student teachers establish and develop their professional identities during ITE, they are faced with a myriad of contexts and experiences, all of which have a lasting impact on how they engage in their practice (Flores and Day 2006).…”
Section: Care and Relatedness In Higher Education And Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have also highlighted the need to develop a new set of orienting principles for our teacher education programmes. The realisation of globally informed and responsible teacher education programmes will require a transformation of our teacher educator identities, regular confrontation with new dilemmas and a significant expansion of our role (Heinz and Fleming 2019). Of course, these are grand, even idealistic, statements that we will need to flesh out further at the level of practice.…”
Section: Conclusion -A New Set Of Orienting Priorities For Teacher Edmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to include this research in the general scientific achievements on the problem of introduction of educational clusters in education and professional training of teachers in such aspects as: theoretical principles of creation and functioning of educational clusters (Chernyshova, 2012;Molnar, 2015;Mphahlele & Rampa, 2014;Piatnytska, 2016;), educational policy (Aitbayeva et al, 2016;Edwards Jr., & Mbatia, 2013); methodology of professional pedagogical training (professional advancement) (Adeyanju, 2016;Chekaleva et al, 2016;Heinz & Fleming, 2019;Mphahlele & Rampa, 2014;Rizvi & Nagy, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%