2003
DOI: 10.21236/ada418125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leading Edge Noise from Thick Foils in Turbulent Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of aerofoil geometry on turbulence-aerofoil interaction noise has been studied extensively (Gershfeld 2004;Roger 2010;Moriarty et al 2005;Lysak et al 2013;Gill et al 2013;Devenport et al 2010;Evers & Peake 2002;Chaitanya et al 2015a). It has been demonstrated by the authors of the current paper Haeri et al 2014;Narayanan et al 2015;Chaitanya et al 2015b;Kim et al 2016) and others that introducing leading edge serrations can be an effective method of reducing far field noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of aerofoil geometry on turbulence-aerofoil interaction noise has been studied extensively (Gershfeld 2004;Roger 2010;Moriarty et al 2005;Lysak et al 2013;Gill et al 2013;Devenport et al 2010;Evers & Peake 2002;Chaitanya et al 2015a). It has been demonstrated by the authors of the current paper Haeri et al 2014;Narayanan et al 2015;Chaitanya et al 2015b;Kim et al 2016) and others that introducing leading edge serrations can be an effective method of reducing far field noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exploited with the use of cross spectral measurements on opposite sides of the foil to reject the incident fields so that the scattered surface pressures can be measured at higher frequencies where the thickness effect is pronounced. The surface pressure cross spectra showed the thickness correction to Seats' fimction [Gershfeld (2003)] tiiat was also observed in the far field from the dipole sound measurements of Amiet (1976,1977) and Olsen and Wagaer (1982). The thickness dependence of the dipole sound is only weakly dependent on the leading edge radius of curvature at the apex of tiie edge and is mainly a fimction of the foil's maximum section thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Figures (1.1) and (1.2) [Gershfeld (2003)] show respectively, a comparison of the measured dipole sound from Amiet (1976,1977) and the predicted dipole sound for a foil with thickness to chord, c, ratio of zero (h/c=0), and with a thickness to chord ratio of the NACA 0012 section, h/c=0.12. The thickness effect is incorporated in the near field portion of the Green fimction that determines, in part, the net dipole force associated with the acoustic radiation from the diffraction of turbulence by an edge of a given geometry [Howe (1998a, b)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there have been attempts at extending the theory to include real geometry effects. By using a modified Greens function to account for plate thickness, Gershfeld 11 showed that radiated sound due to turbulent flow at high frequencies could be reduced by increasing the finite thickness of a flat plate. Glegg and Devenport…”
Section: Iia Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%