Leading Strategic Change 2008
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511488528.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leading strategic change: lessons learned from practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For many years, scholars have proposed the stages of change based on both observations and theory (Armenakis, Harris, & Feild, 1999). Based on change practice in real‐world situations, Flamholtz and Randle (2008) proposed the management systems model, which divides change into the following four stages: (1) “planning” focuses on identifying the needs for (or barriers to) change, identifying the goal of the change process, and developing a plan to establish the awareness of change and convey it to organizational members; (2) “getting started” refers to beginning to implement the change plan and to establishing new mechanisms, behaviors, and attitudes; (3) “letting go” refers to letting go of the “old ways,” embracing the change in the plan, and to building positive organizational culture, standards, and policies; and (4) “completion” entails completing the global change program to maintain the post‐change status and sustained and stable operations, and it represents the beginning of planning for the next change. In the change process, excellent internal communications and contributions are thus extremely important to promoting change (Legris & Collerette, 2006; Scholey, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, scholars have proposed the stages of change based on both observations and theory (Armenakis, Harris, & Feild, 1999). Based on change practice in real‐world situations, Flamholtz and Randle (2008) proposed the management systems model, which divides change into the following four stages: (1) “planning” focuses on identifying the needs for (or barriers to) change, identifying the goal of the change process, and developing a plan to establish the awareness of change and convey it to organizational members; (2) “getting started” refers to beginning to implement the change plan and to establishing new mechanisms, behaviors, and attitudes; (3) “letting go” refers to letting go of the “old ways,” embracing the change in the plan, and to building positive organizational culture, standards, and policies; and (4) “completion” entails completing the global change program to maintain the post‐change status and sustained and stable operations, and it represents the beginning of planning for the next change. In the change process, excellent internal communications and contributions are thus extremely important to promoting change (Legris & Collerette, 2006; Scholey, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership theory has increasingly focused on strategic leadership (Boal & Hooijberg, 2001; Flamholtz & Randle, 2008; Ireland & Hitt, 2005; Storey, 2005). Research has demonstrated the critical importance of strategic leadership to performance, long‐term sustainability, and innovation (Elenkov, Judge, & Wright, 2005; Vera & Crossan, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on leading change emphasizes the critical role of top executives in leading what is referred to as radical, episodic change or discontinuous change (Flamholtz & Randle, 2008; Higgs & Rowland, 2005). Radical, episodic change is most often triggered by disruptive events in an organization's external environment (Demers, 2007; Plowman et al , 2007; Romanelli & Tushman, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations