2006
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2006.876028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf area index retrieval using IRS LISS-III sensor data and validation of the MODIS LAI product over central India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another large uncertainty factor within this extrapolation framework, which could possibly lead to lower extrapolation and model performances, certainly is the input of MODIS LAI/FPAR data. They have often been found to be inaccurate under certain conditions [ Wang et al , 2005; Pandya et al , 2006; Pisek and Chen , 2007; Horn and Schulz , 2010], especially for needleleaf forests [ Wang et al , 2004; Yang et al , 2006a]. Additionally, there is a distinct scale mismatch between EC measurements and MODIS data, and the linkage between these two data sources is complicated by the variability of the area for which EC measurements are representative [ Chen et al 2009, 2010].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another large uncertainty factor within this extrapolation framework, which could possibly lead to lower extrapolation and model performances, certainly is the input of MODIS LAI/FPAR data. They have often been found to be inaccurate under certain conditions [ Wang et al , 2005; Pandya et al , 2006; Pisek and Chen , 2007; Horn and Schulz , 2010], especially for needleleaf forests [ Wang et al , 2004; Yang et al , 2006a]. Additionally, there is a distinct scale mismatch between EC measurements and MODIS data, and the linkage between these two data sources is complicated by the variability of the area for which EC measurements are representative [ Chen et al 2009, 2010].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively few studies used remote sensing to evaluate/validate and retrieve LAI over terrestrial vegetation in India. These studies include agroecosystems (Pandya et al, 2006), or plantations (Datta, 2011) with limited spatial coverage. However, Indian forest vegetation with high structural heterogeneity has not been studied much and need to be understood in spatio-temporal domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upscaled LAI had better agreement with MODIS LAI (RMSE = 0.70) when compared with field measurements. Pandya et al (2006) also showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.62 to 0.78) between MODIS LAI product and LISS-III-derived LAI indicating a good performance of the MODIS LAI product in central India.The main reason behind matching of NDVI-based upscaled LAI to MODIS LAI is mainly due to the averaging of LAI values occurring at coarser resolutions (Williams et al 2008). This is because aggregation leads to lowering of LAI and consequently overcomes the problem of NDVI saturation at high LAI.…”
Section: Comparison Of Upscaled Lai With Modis Lai Productmentioning
confidence: 79%