1987
DOI: 10.1139/x87-036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf area – sapwood cross-sectional area relationships in repressed stands of lodgepole pine

Abstract: To better understand the phenomenon of growth "stagnation" in high-density lodgepole pine (Pinuscontorta Dougl. ex Loud.), leaf area and its relationship with sapwood cross-sectional area were examined on both an individual tree and stand basis. Leaf areas of individual trees in a 22-year-old stand varied from 30.8 m2 (dominants in stands of low stocking) to 0.05 m2 (suppressed trees in stands of high stocking). Leaf area indices ranged from 13.4 to 2.3 m2 m−2 between low and high stocking levels, respectively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our models averaged in R adj 2 = 0.866 (0.744-0.918). Leaf or needle biomass might be stronger affected by other stand characteristics like social status in the stand according to Kraft (1884) or stand density (Barclay et al 1986;Keane and Weetman 1987;Satoo and Madgwick 1982). Also leaves are more susceptible to weather conditions.…”
Section: Predictive Power Of the Models And Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our models averaged in R adj 2 = 0.866 (0.744-0.918). Leaf or needle biomass might be stronger affected by other stand characteristics like social status in the stand according to Kraft (1884) or stand density (Barclay et al 1986;Keane and Weetman 1987;Satoo and Madgwick 1982). Also leaves are more susceptible to weather conditions.…”
Section: Predictive Power Of the Models And Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory predicts a linear relationship between foliage mass or area and the sapwood cross-sectional area below the crown (the slope of the relationship is called the Huber value in stem hydraulics) [37]. Both supporting and non-supporting evidence for the linear relationship between foliage quantity and sapwood area have been found in numerous studies [1,7,8,24,38,43,44,53,108]. Only a few studies on the actual dynamics between foliage area and sapwood area development have been published, but in these studies a linear relationship has been observed [69].…”
Section: Pipe Model Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a good body of work demonstrating the allometric correlation between sapwood area and leaf area [1][2][3][4][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. However, one of the biggest problems in using these allometric correlations is the species-specific physio-and morphological variations that influence the tree's allometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%